期刊文献+

公共服务提供商的法律责任的经济分析

Economic Analysis of Public Service Providers’s liability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当公共服务提供商因过失而导致客户遭受损失时,可供立法者选择的责任模式有三种:全部赔偿责任、部分赔偿责任和无责任规则。不同的责任规则的实施后果是不同的。当公共服务商无法对客户的风险水平做出区分或无法进行区别对待时,出于对注意成本和补贴效应的权衡,限制责任规则要优于其他责任规则。我国相关立法应对公共服务提供商的赔偿责任做出明确的限制。 When public service providers' s negligent behaviour cause the harm of customers, there are three liability rules for lawmaker to choose: full liability, limited liability, and no liability rule. Different liability rule has different effect. When public service provider cannot observe the level of their customers' s risk or provide individual service, limited liability rule is superior to other rules, public service providers' s liability should be limited by law in china.
作者 周学峰
出处 《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2009年第3期148-152,共5页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 公共服务提供商 法律责任 经济分析 public service provider liability economic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Steven Shavell,Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law,Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,2004.
  • 2Lucien Ayre Bebchuk Steven Shavell,Information and the Scope of Liability for Breach of Contract:The Rule of Hadley v.Baxendale,7 Journal of Law,Economics,Organization,1991.
  • 3Gwyn D.Quillen,Contract Damages and Cross-Subsidization,61 Southern California Law Review,1988.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部