期刊文献+

GRADE:在推荐分级中体现对资源利用的考虑 被引量:2

Incorporating Considerations of Resources Use into Grading Recommendations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 指南小组成员对资源利用是否会影响个体患者的治疗决策有不同看法。由于医疗费用上涨,必须考虑资源利用的影响,但指南小组成员可能会发现这有很大的挑战性。
机构地区 代表GRADE工作组
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2009年第6期610-613,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Guyatt G, Baumann M, Pauker S, et al. Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical practice guideline panels: suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest, 2006, 129(1): 182-187.
  • 2Eddy DM. Comparing benefits and harms: the balance sheet. JAMA, 1990, 263(18): 2493, 2498, 2501.
  • 3Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The magpie trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2002, 359(9321): 1877-1890.
  • 4Simon J, Gray A, Duley L. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic magnesium sulphate for 9996 women with pre-eclampsia from 33 countries: economic evaluation of the magpie trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 2006, 113(2): 144-151.
  • 5Montori VM, laeschke R, Schbnemann HJ, et al. Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports. BMJ, 2004, 329(7474): 1093-1096.
  • 6Luce B, Manning W, Siegel J. Estimating costs in cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996: 176-213.
  • 7Friedberg M, Saffran B, Stinson TJ, et al. Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology, JAMA, 1999, 282(15): 1453-1457.
  • 8Garber AM, Phelps CE. Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ, 1997, 16(1): 1-31.
  • 9Owens DK. Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses. J Gen Intern Med, 1998, 13(10): 716-717.
  • 10Gold M, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

同被引文献33

  • 1刘鸣.临床实践指南意义、建立方法和评价[J].中国卒中杂志,2006,1(1):33-36. 被引量:19
  • 2Davis KA. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: a review. J Intensive Care Med, 2006, 21(4): 211-226.
  • 3Joseph NM, Sistla S, Dutta TK, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: a review. Eur J Intern Med, 2010, 21(5): 360-368.
  • 4http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/.
  • 5Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013, 66(1): 140-150.
  • 6Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013, 66(2): 151-157.
  • 7Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, et al. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013, 66(2): 158-172.
  • 8Guyatt GH, Thorlund K, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013, 66(2): 173-183.
  • 9Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013, 66(7): 726-735.
  • 10Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41(2): 580-637.

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部