期刊文献+

美国金融监管的法律与政策困局之反思——兼及对我国金融监管之启示 被引量:96

A Reflection on the Dilemma of American Financial Supervision Law and Policy
原文传递
导出
摘要 对美国金融监管困局的反思表明,多年来"做大"金融市场份额即等同于提升市场竞争力的迷思,使美国陷入了监管失效的困境。同时,美国现行联邦和州多重监管的体制,导致监管成本高企、效率低下、监管重叠与监管真空并存、"监管竞次"和"监管套利"等重重积弊。此外,过于陈旧落后而不适应虚拟经济形态的的金融法规、以及金融监管部门屡被特殊利益集团俘获,更直接导致了监管灾难。鉴此,我国必须走出金融法"唯美(美国)主义"之陷阱,信守金融监管保护投资者之基础价值,彻底反思并重构不适应虚拟经济形态的金融法规,并运用"分期治理"之政治智慧推动金融监管框架之完善,将金融监管规则真正还原为市场和技术规则,而不是人际和政治之术。 The reflection on the financial control perplexity indicates that expanding the financial market shares equates enhancing the market competitiveness, which turns out to be kind of myth, leads to the finan- cial control failure of United States. In the meanwhile, the multi - level control system resulting from the Fed- eral and State superviosry administrations produces the costly but inefficient financial control, the coexistence of duplicate regulation and regulatory gap, race - to - the - bottom regulation and regulatory arbitrage. In addi- tion, the outdated financial institution failing to meet the challenges of the new economy and the fact that finan- cial regulators had been captured by the interests group induce the control calamity. For those reasons, China should not always follow the footsteps of America, but should adhere to the underlying value of financial control and improve the outdated financial regulation. Furthermore, with the financial regulation as the market and technical rules but not the interpersonal and political arts in mind, the financial control framework should be improved based on the "periodical governance" wisdom.
作者 罗培新
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期91-105,共15页 China Legal Science
基金 国家社科基金课题“公司治理法律制度研究”(06CFX013) 上海市第三期重点学科--经济法学(S30902)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1王晨.《华尔街缘何说垮就垮:都是贪婪惹的祸》,载《北京青年报》2008年10月13日.
  • 2Charles E.Schumer & Michael R.Bloomberg,To Save New York,Learn farm London,Wall Steer Journal.,Nov.1,2006,at A18.
  • 3John C.Coffee,Jr.,Racing Towards the Top?The Impact of Cross-Listings and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Govemance,102 Columbia Law Review,1757(2002)
  • 4Steven M.Davidoff,Regulating Listings in a Global Market,86 N.C.L.REV.89(2007)
  • 5Donald C.Langevoort,The Social Construction of Sarbanes-Oxley,105 Michigan Law Review,1817(2007)
  • 6Kate Litvak,Sarbanes-Oxley and the Cross-Listing Premium,105 Michigan Law Review,1858(2007).
  • 7Alex Halperia,New York:No Longer the IPO King,Dec.27,2006,www.businessweek.com.
  • 8Stoneridge Inv.Partners.LLC v.Scientific-Atlanta,Inc.,128 S.Ct.761,772(2008).
  • 9Elizabeth F.Browne,The Tyranny of the Multitude is a Multiplied Tyranny:Is The United States Financial Regulatory Structure Undermining U.S.Competitiveness?2 Brooldyn Jonrnal of Corporate,Financial & Commerical Law.Spring,2008.pp.374-376.
  • 10Richard H.K.Vietor,How Countries Compete:Straegy,Structure,and Govemment in the Global Economy 1(2007).

二级参考文献76

  • 1崔之元.《美国二卜九个州公司法变革的理论背景及对我国的启发》[J].经济研究,1996,(4).
  • 2詹姆斯·布坎南,戈登·塔洛克.《同意的计算-立宪民主的逻辑基础》,陈光金译,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000年,第21页.
  • 3《SOX法案》第301条
  • 4我国《关于在上市公司建立独立董事制度的指导意见》.
  • 5我国《证券投资基金管理公司治理准则》第15条.
  • 6《中华人民共和国证券法》.第129,150,151条.
  • 7博登海默.《法理学:法律哲学与法律方法》,邓正来译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999年,第507页.
  • 8Alex Halperin,New York: No Longer the IPO King,Dec. 27, 2006, http://www. businessweek. eom/investor/content/dec2006/pi20061227 _ 944762. htm, April 26, 2008.
  • 9Steven A. Ramirez, to CEO Primacy and the "The Special Interest Race End of Corporate Govern- ance Law, " Delaware Journal of Corporate Law vol. 32, 2007, p. 391.
  • 10Gary Strauss and Barbara Hansen, "CEO Pay Soars in 2005 as a. Select Group Break the $ 100 Million Mark," April 11, 2006,http://www. usatoday. com/money/companies/management/2006- 04-09-ceo-compensation-report _ x. htm, May 6, 2008.

共引文献116

同被引文献958

引证文献96

二级引证文献552

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部