期刊文献+

传统描述、直接指称与二维语义理论 被引量:2

Theory of Description,Direct Denotational Semantics and Two-Dimensional Semantics
原文传递
导出
摘要 在探讨语词的意义时,传统描述理论主张语词的意义由某个或某些描述语以某种特定的方式给出,直接指称理论主张语词的意义就是语词所指称的对象本身,两者各有偏颇。二维语义理论则展示了一种关于语义内容的双重组合。在二维框架下,每个表达式都有两种不同的内涵:认知内涵和虚拟内涵。它们均对表达式的意义的解释承担角色。 In discussing the meaning of a word, Theory of Description contends that the meaning of an expression is determined by a description or some descriptions by certain way; Direct Denotational Semantics contends that the meaning of an expression is determined by the object itself. Both of them em- phasize one thing at the expense of another. By contrast, Two-Dimensional Semantics holds that the meaning of an expression has dual dimensions which are composed of both them. According to Two-Dimensional Semantics, every expression has two kinds of intentions: epistemic intention and subjunctive intention. The former is evaluated in epistemic domain, the later is evaluated in metaphysical domain. Both of them play different explanatory roles.
作者 惠继红
机构地区 中山大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期36-41,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 传统描述理论 直接指称理论 二维语义理论 认知内涵 虚拟内涵 认知的可能世界 形而上学的可能世界 theory of description direct denotational semantics two-dimensional semantics epistemic intention subjunctive intention epistemic pos- sible world metaphysical possible world
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1G 弗雷格.论涵义和指称[C]//涂纪亮.语言哲学名著选辑:英美部分.三联书店,1988.
  • 2John R Searle.Proper Names Mind[J].New Series,Vol.67,No.266.Apr.,1958.
  • 3Saul Kripke.Naming and Necessity[M].Basil Blackwell Publisher,1980.
  • 4W V O Quine.From A Logical Point of View[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1953.
  • 5Chalmers J David.Two-Dimensional Semantics[EB/OL].http://consc.net/pepers.html 或 Chalmers,J.David:Two-Dimensional Semantics,In E.Leporo and B.Smith eds,The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Language[C].Oxford.Oxford University Press,2006.
  • 6Chalmers J David.On Sense and Intension[EB/OL].http://consc.net/papers.html 或 Chalmers J David.On Sense and Intension,Vol.36,Supplement:Philosophical Perspectives[J].Language and Mind:16,2002.

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部