女权主义法学的性别平等观对中国立法的启示被引量：10

Viewing China's Legislation from the Perspective of Gender Equality in Feminist Jurisprudence

导出

摘要女权主义法学兴起于20世纪六七十年代,其理论流派众多,解析性别平等的视角和重点也各有不同。本文重点评析了自由女权主义法学、激进女权主义法学、结果平等女权主义法学和综合女权主义法学以及后现代女权主义法学的性别平等观,并试图从它们的视角探讨中国立法应如何保障妇女权益,促进男女平等。 Feminist jurisprudence, arising in the 1960＇s and the 1970＇s, has embraced different schools of thinking, diverse perspectives on gender equality and their application in legislative action in western countries. This article discusses the different perspectives of feminist legal theories on gender equality, varying from liberal feminist jurisprudence, through radical and outcome equality and comprehensive feminist jurisprudence, to postmodem feminist jurisprudence, in order to inform Chinese legislative practices.

作者赵明

机构地区武汉大学社会学系

出处《妇女研究论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期10-15,共6页 Journal of Chinese Women＇s Studies

关键词女权主义法学性别平等立法 feminist jurisprudence, gender equality, legislation

分类号 C613.68 [社会学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1Mary Wollstonccraft. A Vindication of the Rights of Women: with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects [M]. London: Joseph Johnson, 1790.
2Patricia A.Cain. Feminism and the Limits of Equality[M].Temple University Press, 1991.
3Wendy Williams. Equality' s Riddle: Pregnancy and the Equal Treatment/Special Treatment Debate[J]. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, Vol. XIII,1984-85,(2).
4Catharine A. MacKinnon. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
5Catharine A. Mackinon. Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence[J]. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol.8, No.4,1983.
6Kathleen E. Mahoney and Sheilah L. Martin. Equality and Judicial Neutrality [M]. Carswell Legal Pubns, 1987.
7Lynn Smith. Righting the Balance: Canada's New Equality Rights[M]. Saskatoon: The Canadian Human Rights Reporter Inc., 1986.
8Susan. B. Boyd.& E. Sheehy. Feminist Perspectives on Law: Canadian Theory and Practice [J]. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, Vol.2, 1986.
9Joan W. Scott. Deconstructing Equality-Versus- Difference: or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism[M]. New York University Press, 1995.
10刘小楠.美国女权主义法学平等与差异观研究[J].法制与社会发展,2005,11(3):147-154. 被引量：17

二级参考文献12

1Catharine A. Mackinnon. Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence [A]. in D. Kelly Weisberg (ed.). Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations [C]. Temple University Press, 1991.
2Martha ChamaUas. Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory [ M]. Aspen Publishers, A Wohers Kluwer Company, 2003.
3Patricia A. Cain. Feminism and the Limits of Equality [A]. in D. Kelly Weisberg (ed.). Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations[ C]. Temple University Press, 1991.
4Henna Hill Kay. Equality and Difference: The Case of Pregnancy [A]. in Patricia Smith (ed.). Feminist Jurisprudence [C].Oxford University Press, 1993.
5Martha Chamallas. Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory [ M]. Aspen Publishers, A Wolters Kluwer Company, 2003.
6Wendy Williams, Equality' s Riddle: Pregnancy and the Equal Treatment/Special Treatment Debate [J]. 13 N. Y. U. Rev.L. & Soc. Change, 1984-85.
7Robin West. Jurisprudence and Gender [A]. in Patricia Smith (ed.). Feminist Jurisprudence [C]. Oxford University Press,1993.
8Catharine A. Mackinnon. Desire and Power, in Feminism Unmodified [M]. Harvard University Press, 1987.
9Catharine A. Mackinnon. Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination [A]. in Feminism Unmodified [C]. Harvard University Press, 1987.
10Martha Minow. Feminist Reason: Getting It and Losing It [M]. J. Legal Educ, 1988.