期刊文献+

2009年广州市某医学院学生禽流感认知程度调查 被引量:6

An Investigation on Students Cognition of Avian Influenza in a Guangzhou Medical University in 2009
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]了解广州某医学院校医学生对禽流感的认知程度,探讨切实可行的推广措施预防禽流感。[方法]2009年1月,在广州中医药大学抽取各医学院2~5年级学生1300人进行调查。[结果]调查1158人,禽流感知识来源主要为电视、广播的占20.64%,报刊占24.29%,网络占35.92%,民间消息占9.15%,宣传栏、宣传小册子占10.02%。50.29%曾购买活禽或冰鲜禽类,75.73%曾在宿舍煮食。禽流感认知得分为(78.86±4.15)分,中位数为80.17分,防护指数属于中度。[结论]该校医学生对禽流感的认知程度属中等,半数以上有感染禽流感的危险行为。 [Objeclive]To explore an effective promotion model for AI (Avian Influenza) prevention by investigating students'cognition of Al in a Guangzhou medical university. [Methods]1 300 students ranging from Grade 2 to 5 in all schools at Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine were randomly selected for survey. [Resulls]The channels to acquire At knowledge, reported by the 1 158 students in the survey, are mainly from TV and broadcasting programs (20.64 % ), newspapers (24.29 % ), internet(35.92 %), folk information ( 9.15 %), and posters and pamphlets ( 10.02 % ). 50.29 % of the students have once purchased live or chilled poultry products, and 75.73 % of them have cooked such food in the dormitory. The mean AI cognition score is 78.86 ± 4. 15, with the medium being 80. 17. The prevention index is moderate. [Conclusion]Students'eognition of Al in this medical university is moderate, with half of them having dangerous Al-affeeted behavior.
作者 张晓轩 陈君
出处 《预防医学论坛》 2009年第6期495-497,共3页 Preventive Medicine Tribune
基金 广州中医药大学第二临床医学院科研创新基金
关键词 禽流感 认识 防护指数 Avian influenza Cognition Index of protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献25

  • 1郝元涛,孙希凤,方积乾,吴少敏,朱淑明.量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2004,21(4):209-211. 被引量:174
  • 2赵利,刘凤斌,梁国辉,方积乾,林丽珠,陈金泉.中华生存质量量表的理论结构模型研制探讨[J].中国临床康复,2004,8(16):3132-3134. 被引量:50
  • 3赵利,陈金泉,梁国辉,刘凤斌,方积乾.因子分析法在生存质量测定量表研制中的应用[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2004,24(11):965-968. 被引量:10
  • 4易波,袁渭.禽流感病毒的公共危害及预防研究进展[J].浙江预防医学,2005,17(2):61-63. 被引量:7
  • 5李晶,杨本付,陈廷,刘根义,刘欣,张莹波,孙占国,陈洪鹏.411名大学生自我概念的多因素分析[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(9):849-849. 被引量:8
  • 6汪向东 王希林 等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:31-130.
  • 7Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, et al. On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. 2rd ed. Brussels: EORTC Quality of Life Group translation procedure 2002
  • 8Blazeby J,Sprangers M,Cull A,et al.Guidelines for Developing Questionnaire Modules.3rd ed.Brussels: EORTC Quality of Life Group 2002
  • 9Patrick DL. Patient reported outcomes (PROs): an organizing tool for concept measures and applications. Quality of life news letter, University of Washington 2003:1-5
  • 10U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Center for Devices and adiological Health (CDRH). Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling 2006

共引文献83

同被引文献73

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部