期刊文献+

任务难度对前瞻记忆TAP效应影响的研究 被引量:10

Influences of Ongoing task's Resource Demands on the TAP Effect in Prospective Memory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 前瞻记忆中的TAP效应是指,当进行中任务和前瞻任务加工类型一致时,前瞻记忆成绩要好于两者加工类型不一致时。该研究采用双重任务范式,以大学生为被试,探讨了进行中任务难度对前瞻记忆TAP效应的影响,以揭示注意资源在TAP效应产生中的关键作用。结果表明:当进行中任务难度较低时,没有出现TAP效应,即进行中任务和前瞻任务的加工类型是否一致不会对前瞻记忆成绩产生显著影响;当进行中任务难度较高时,TAP效应部分出现。进一步说,当进行中任务加工类型为语义型时,语义型的前瞻任务成绩要显著好于结构型的前瞻任务成绩;而当进行中任务加工类型为结构型时,前瞻任务的加工类型没有对前瞻记忆成绩产生显著影响。 The transfer-appropriate processing effect in prospective memory refers to the phenomenon that the performance of prospective memory is better when the processing types of the ongoing task and the prospective task are consistent than when they are inconsistent. Using the dual-task experimental paradigm, our research explored the influence of the ongoing task's resource demanding on the TAP effect in prospective memory. The result shows that the differences of the ongoing task's resource demanding do have an effect on the TAP effect in prospective memory. When the ongoing task is easy, whether or not the processing types of an ongoing task and a prospective task are consistent does not affect the performance of prospective memory; when the ongoing task is difficult, whether or not the processing types of the two tasks have an effect on prospective memory depends on the type of ongoing tasks. The TAP effect is found only under the condition of the semantic ongoing task. When the ongoing task requires perceptual processing, the processing type has no influence on the performance of prospective memory.
作者 孙瑶 周仁来
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期528-530,583,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 前瞻记忆 TAP效应 任务难度 prospective memory TAP effect tasks' resource demands
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1朱磊,孙里宁.前瞻记忆的字形、语音TAP效应研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(5):1124-1126. 被引量:4
  • 2Kvavilashvili L, Ellis J. Varieties of intention: some distinctions and classification. In: Brandimonte M A, Einstein G O, McDaniel M A. ed. Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 23~51
  • 3Einstein G O, McDaniel M A. Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 1990,16(4): 717~726
  • 4Einstein G O, Holland L J, McDaniel M A., et al. Age-related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity. Psychology and Aging, 1992, 7(3): 471~478
  • 5Cherry K E, LeCompet D C. Age and individual differences influence prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 1999,14(1): 60~76
  • 6Maylor E A. Aging and forgetting in prospective and retrospective memory tasks. Psychology and Aging, 1993, 8(3): 420~428
  • 7Maylor E A. Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective memory task. Psychology and Aging, 1996,11(2): 74~78
  • 8Park D C, Hertzog C, Kidder D P, et al. Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 1997,12(2): 314~327
  • 9McDaniel M A, Robinson-Riegler B, Einstein G O. Prospective remembering: perceptually driven or conceptually driven process? Memory and Cognition, 1998, 26(1): 121~134
  • 10Craik F I M, Jennings J M. Human memory, In: Craik F I M, Salthouse T A. ed. The handbook of aging and cognition Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992. 55~110

共引文献28

同被引文献73

引证文献10

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部