中美护理高等教育评价比较研究

Evaluation and comparative Study for Sino-US nursing higher education

目的分析中美两国在护理高等教育评价上的研究方向以及各自护理高等教育评价的特点，找出差异，为完善我国护理高等教育评价体系提供借鉴。方法检索PubMed和CNKI数据库于1997～2008年发表的关于中美护理高等教育评价的文献，运用内容分析法、比较研究法以及SPSS13．0统计软件进行分析。结果两国对护理高等教育评价的研究内容主要包括评价机构、评价指标体系、评价程序（或模式）以及评价手段。两国的评价机构和指标体系有很大不同。我国评价程序单一，对评价程序（或模式）的研究比例少于美国（P〈0．01），且对评价手段的研究文献多属于综述类文献，研究类文献少。结论我国政府行政部门和护理专业学者已意识到护理高等教育评价的紧迫性和重要性。我们要借鉴美国的先进经验，成立适合我国国情的护理高等教育评价专业机构，构建评价指标体系，加强评价程序（或模式）和评价手段的研究，完善护理高等教育评价体系，促进护理高等教育的发展。

Objective To analyze the characteristics and difference related to research directions for higher nursing education evaluation between Sino-US higher nursing education, and to provide experience for improving the higher nursing education evaluation system in China. Method The published articles related to Sino-US higher nursing education from the year of 1997 to 2008 was searched by Pub Med and CNKI. Analysis and comparative method was used to study the collected data, and SPSS13.0 was used for data analysis. Result Most researches concentrated on institutions indicator systems, procedures （or models） and means of accreditation. The institution and indicator systems of the two countries are different, There is only one single procedure of accreditation in China, the proportion of studies on accreditation model is less than that of the unite states （P〈0.01）. Most of the accreditation is reviewed articles. Conclusior Our government and scholars on nursing have realized the urgency to accredit higher nursing education, We need to use the US experience for reference and establishing an evaluation system accordance with actual situation so as to promote the development of higher nursing education in China.