期刊文献+

基于性能的结构抗风设计理论框架 被引量:17

Framework on Performance-Based Wind-Resistant Design Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出了基于性能的结构抗风设计理论框架,将风压强度划分为4个设计风压等级(弱风压、中风压、强风压及超强风压),将人体振动舒适度划分为6个等级(无振感、轻微振感、中等振感、烦恼、非常烦恼和无法忍受)、三种振动水平(与人的舒适感相关的振动水平、与人正常工作和操作有关的振动水平、与人的生理健康直接相关的振动水平)。结合不同类别建筑物的性能需求及人体振动舒适度的要求,将结构风振性能水准划分为4种状态(性能健康、性能亚健康、性能病态及性能丧失),将结构风振性能目标划分为5个等级(A、B、C、D、E)。提出了结构抗风概念设计与计算分析的一般原则,给出了结构性能抗风安全性评价及社会经济评价基本内容的建议。 Based on the researches at home and abroad, a tentative framework on performance-based windresistant design theory is proposed in this paper. Four kinds of wind pressure fortification levels (weak wind-pressure, middle wind-pressure, strong wind-pressure and super-strong wind-pressure) are proposed. Human body's vibration comfort is suggested to be divided into six kinds of vibration ranks (without vibration sense, mild vibration sense, middling vibration sense, annoyance, super annoyance and unable tolerance) and three kinds of vibration levels (vibration level correlate with human's general life, with human's general work and with human's physical health). Four states of structural performance level (performance health, performance sub-health, performance ill-health and performance loss) were divided according to performance demands of different buildings, and human body's vibration comfort, and five ranks of structural performance objective (A, B, C, D and E) are proposed. General principles of structural wind-resistant conceptual design and calculation are suggested and basic matters of safety evaluation and socioeconomic evaluation are advised.
出处 《防灾减灾工程学报》 CSCD 2009年第3期244-251,共8页 Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering
基金 高等学校博士点学科专项基金项目(200810780001) 广东省自然科学基金团队项目(8351009101000001)资助
关键词 基于性能的结构抗风设计 设计风压等级 风振性能水准 结构性能目标 performance-based wind-resistant design wind pressure fortification level wind-induced vibration performance level structural performance objective
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Moehle J P. Displacement based design of RC structure[C]// 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Mexico: WECC, 1992.
  • 2Structural Engineering Association of California ( SEAOC ), Vision2000 Committee. Performance based seismic engineering of buildings[S]. 1995.1-2.
  • 3BSSC. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulation of new buildings and other structures[R]. Washington D. C. : FEMA302, 1998.
  • 4FEMA368. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures l-R]. Washington D. C. : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 5FEMA355. Washington D. C. : State of the art report on connection performance[R]. Washington D. C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 6FEMA 356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings [R]. Washington, D. C. : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 7汪梦甫,周锡元.混凝土高层建筑结构地震破坏准则研究现状分析[J].工程抗震,2002(3):1-4. 被引量:12
  • 8田颖,钱稼茹,刘凤阁.在用RC框架结构基于位移的抗震性能评估[J].建筑结构,2001,31(7):53-56. 被引量:26
  • 9GB50009-2001,建筑荷载设计规范[S].
  • 10JGJ3-2002.高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程[S].[S].,..

二级参考文献23

  • 1刘柏权,徐云中,白绍良.钢筋混凝土柱在等幅对称位移循环加载下的低周疲劳性能[J].重庆建筑大学学报,1996,18(2):34-42. 被引量:19
  • 2建筑抗震鉴定标准(GB50023-95),1995年
  • 3建筑抗震设计规范(GBJ11-89),1989年
  • 4Tsai K C,CEER/R 83,1984年
  • 5钱稼茹,建筑结构,2000年,30卷,6期
  • 6FEMA273/274. HEHRP Commentary on the Guidelines for the Rehabitation of Buildings [ R ]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D. C. 11,1996.
  • 7ATC-40. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building [ R ]. Applied Technology Council. Red Wood City, California, 1996.
  • 8Vision 2000 Committee. Performance-based engineering of building[A]. Miranda E. Seismology Committee of the Structure Engineer Association of California [ C ], Oakland:Wiley Inc, 1995.
  • 9Vitelmo V Bertero. Performance-Based Engineering:Conventional VS. Innovative Approaches [ A ]. In 12WCEE [C]. 2000.
  • 10謝舜傑.築耐震法规有關性能式规定之探討[J].结構工程,16(3).

共引文献1255

同被引文献269

引证文献17

二级引证文献127

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部