期刊文献+

口腔癌细胞诱导的淋巴管内皮细胞基因表达谱的变化 被引量:1

Altered gene expression of lymphatic endothelial cells in oral cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在口腔癌细胞影响下淋巴管内皮细胞分子表型的变化。方法利用体外共培养模型,将淋巴管内皮细胞与口腔癌细胞进行共培养,模拟肿瘤中淋巴管内皮细胞的变化。应用Affymetrix U133Plus2.0基因芯片对肿瘤组织中淋巴管内皮细胞(TLEC)与淋巴管内皮细胞(LEC)基因表达的差异进行了检测和比较。并对功能相似的表达差异基因进行分类。结果差异基因表达谱共发现了677个基因表达差异在1倍以上,其中在TLEC中表达上调的基因有384条,下调的基因有293条。这些基因与细胞黏附、凋亡、运动、发育及血管生成有关。同时这些基因还参与细胞的信号传导、免疫应答、细胞代谢等过程。结论LEC与TLEC在分子水平是有差别的。以此为基础,可以针对淋巴管内皮细胞进行靶向阻断,达到治疗口腔癌淋巴道转移的目的。 Objective To explore altered molecular phenotype of lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC) induced by oral cancer cells. It is relevant to develop therapeutic strategies for blocking oral cancer spread through lymphatic vessels. Methods LEC were co-cultured with oral cancer cells in a model. Differential gene expression profiles between tumor-derived lymphatic endothelial cell (TLEC) and LEC were analyzed by Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip arrays. Differential expression genes of functional similarity were classified. Results Differential gene expression profiles revealed that 677 unique genes had at least a twofold change in expression level between the two groups, 384 were overexpressed, and 293 were underexpressed in TLEC. These genes were related to cell adhesion, apoptosis, cell motility, development, and angiogenesis. In addition, some genes were involved in signal transduetion, immune response, cell metabolism, and so on. Conclusion LEC and TLEC are distinct at the molecular level, A novel therapeutic strategy of lymphatic metastasis is encouraging and anticipated based upon manipulation of LEC responses to oral cancer cells.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期330-334,共5页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30400505和39700162) 四川省科技攻关计划资助项目(05SG022-018-3)
关键词 口腔癌 淋巴管内皮细胞 淋巴道转移 基因芯片 oral cancer lymphatic endothelial cell lymphatic metastasis gene microarray
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Saharinen P, Tammela T, Karkkainen M J, et al. Lymphatic vasculature: Development, molecular regulation and role in tumor metastasis and inflammation[J]. Trends Immunol, 2004, 25 (7): 387-395.
  • 2Shayan R, Achen MG, Stacker SA. Lymphatic vessels in cancer metastasis: Bridging the gaps[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2006, 27 (9): 1729-1735.
  • 3Hewett PW. Identification of tumour-induced changes in endothelial cell surface protein expression: An in vitro model[J]. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 2001, 33(4):325-335.
  • 4Pathak AP, Bhujwalla ZM, Pepper MS. Visualizing function in the tumor-associated lymphatic system[J]. Lymphat Res Biol, 2004, 2(4) : 165-172.
  • 5Leemans CR, Tiwari R, Nauta JJ, et al. Regional lymph node involvement and its significance in the development of distant metastases in head and neck carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 1993, 71 (2): 452-456.
  • 6Greenberg JS, Fowler R, Gomez J, et al. Extent of extracapsular spread: A critical prognosticator in oral tongue cancer[J]. Cancer, 2003, 97 (6) : 1464-1470.
  • 7Ji RC. Lymphatic endothelial cells, tumor lymphangiogenesis and metastasis: New insights into intratumoral and peritumoral lymphatics[J]. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2006, 25 (4):677-694.
  • 8Brown P. Lymphatic system: Unlocking the drains[J]. Nature, 2005, 436 (7050) : 456-458.
  • 9Beasley NJ, Prevo R, Banerji S, et al. Intratumoral lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer[J]. Cancer Res, 2002, 62(5): 1315-1320.
  • 10Kyzas PA, Geleff S, Batistatou A, et al. Evidence for lymphangiogenesis and its prognostic implications in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Pathol, 2005, 206(2): 170-177.

同被引文献11

  • 1Wakisaka N, Hirota K, Kondo S, et al. Induction of lymphangio- genesis through vascular endothelial growth factor-C/vascular endo- thelial growth factor receptor 3 axis and its correlation with lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [ J ]. Oral Oncol, 2012, 48(8) :703-708.
  • 2Sugiura T, Inoue Y, Matsuki R, et al. VEGF-C and VEGF-D ex- pression is correlated with lymphatic vessel density and lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Implications for use as a prognostic marker [J].Int J Oncol, 2009, 34(3) :673-680.
  • 3Kozlowski M, Naumnik W, Niklinski J, et al. Lymphatic vessel invasion detected by the endothelial lymphatic marker D2-40 (po- doplanin) is predictive of regional lymph node status and an inde- pendent prognostic factor in patients with resected esophageal canc-er [J]. Folia Histochem Cytobiol, 2011, 49(1 ) :90-97.
  • 4Cimpean A M, Mazuru V, Saptefrati L, et al. Prox 1, VEGF-C and VEGFR3 expression during cervical neoplasia progression as evidence of an early lymphangiogenic switch [ J ]. Histol His- topathol, 2012,27 ( 12 ) : 1543-1550.
  • 5Du Y, Liu H, He Y, et al. The interaction between LYVE-1 with hyaluronan on the cell surface may play a role in the diversity of ad- hesion to cancer cells [ J ]. PLos One, 2013,8 (5) :63463.
  • 6Yoshida Y, Yamashita T, Nagano K, et al. Limited expression of reticulocalbin-1 in lymphatic endothelial cells in lung tumor but not in normal lung [ J ]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2011,405 (4) :610-614.
  • 7Yang S, Zhu X, Cai L, et al. Role of tumor-associated lymphatic endothelial ceils in metastasis: a study of epithelial ovarian tumor in vitro [J]. Cancer Sci, 2010,101(3) :679-685.
  • 8Alitalo K, Carmeliet P. Molecular mechanisms of lymphangiogene- sis in health and disease [ J ]. Cancer Cell, 2002,1 (3) :219-227.
  • 9覃文新,樊嘉.肿瘤微环境[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2013:243-260.
  • 10赵志敏,叶永安,王硕仁,朱陵群,高永红,孙逸坤.细胞培养实验中条件培养基相关问题探讨[J].中西医结合肝病杂志,2010,20(1):23-26. 被引量:2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部