法官审判思维之透析

An In-depth Analysis of a Judge’s Trial Thinking

法官思维具有多维性,它是缜密逻辑与经验方法的统一,是价值判断与抽象哲学的统一。理性思维,是运用逻辑分析,提供因果必然性联系的思维方式。审判实践中,表现为法官的大多判决力求事实与法律适用前后逻辑一致。经验思维,是直接与客观存在相接触,没有任何中间环节,它可以有效避免因非直接接触而产生的失误;由此,经验思维便可能使自己与客观存在保持尽可能的同一。合理性思维属于评价,讲的是"好",而且讲的是诸种理由中最好的理由。哲学思维即意味着其超越理性、经验性和合理性思维,以自己所理解和掌握的现代司法理念引领思维方向,使结果与正义相互和谐,是思维的思维。

A judge＇s thinking should be multi-dimensional, which is the unification of meticulous logic and empirical thinking as well as the unification of value judgment and abstract philosophy. Rational thinking provides causality by utilizing logic analysis, which demonstrates itself in the logic consistence of a judge＇s conviction between reality and legal feasibility in the trial practice. Experiential thinking links the actual reality directly, enabling the judge to conform to the actual reality. Reasonable thinking is a means of evaluation. Philosophical thinking, a superior thinking beyond rational, empirical and reasonable thinking, will guide the whole thinking into the mutual harmony of result and justice through grasping modern judicature concepts.