“季札观乐”等非删诗说经典论据之辨析

A Discussion on Classic Evidence on Non-delete of Book of Poetry

针对北大中文论坛"中国古代文学.诗词文赋.孔子删诗说"条下非删诗论者所罗列的"季札观乐"等四个方面"认为孔子的‘删诗’不能够成立"的依据,利用文献分析的方法,得出如下结论:司马迁所谓的古诗"三千余篇"并非妄言,在没有充分的资料作为依据的前提下,对于"删诗说"不应该简单否定,至少论坛所提供的理论依据尚不足以成立。

To aim directly at four evidences to disapprove Confucius＇ deletion of Book of Poetry, which listed under the item ＇he Chinese ancient times literature＇poems and prose＇Confucius＇ deletion of Poetry＇ of Chinese forum of Beijing University, using the literature analytic method, the conclusion was made that more than three-thousand poems that Sima Qian had told is not absurd, and it should not completely deny the Confucius＇ deletion of Book of Poetry when there were not sufficient information used as evidence. At least, the four negative theoretical evidences provided were not enough to be set up.