违反国际规范行为的国际关系理论分析

Analysis of Violation of International Norm in International Politics

国际关系主流学派对违反国际规范原因分析上仍存在较大分歧。理性主义学派认为违反国际规范是国际规范与国家利益相互冲突造成的,建构主义学派认为是由于国际规范参照系模糊性与特定国际环境下决策的观念导致的。国际政治心理学认为,决策者的动机偏见使得决策者在解释其政策和外部环境时,出于维护国家利益的需要将违反国际规范视为社会可接受的行为。此外,国际规范中存在多元的参照系数和决策者对于国际环境不同认识,使得决策者在违反国际规范时心理上存在侥幸或者刻意采取不同的标准对其行为进行解释。违反国际规范的行为是由于国际规范本身的相对的模糊性和决策者对于规范本身认知上的主观性造成的。文章试图在分析违反国际规范行为的心理因素的基础上,探究理性主义和建构主义在违反国际规范原因分析上的契合点。

There are many disagreements of school suggests that states violate international est. Constructivism school supposes that bias of violating international norms research. Rational norms because they are against national interdecision makers leads to violating international norms. Meanwhile, there many criteria and parameter of international norms, which make it possible for states to violate international norms. The ambiguity of international norms and bias of decision makers are the mainly reason for violation. The article analyzes the reasons for violating international norms to bridge the theory of rational school and constructivism school.