期刊文献+

分散的权力:从MOX Plant案析国际法庭管辖权之冲突 被引量:12

Scattered Powers:Conflicts between International—Tribunals in the MOX Plant Case
原文传递
导出
摘要 伴随数十年来国际法的繁荣与多样化,国际司法机构日益扩散。它们效力于不同的法律体系,其司法权力分散并相互割离,目前对国际司法机构之间的合作与冲突尚无一般国际法规则,它们的分散权力加剧了国际法的碎片化,协调国际司法管辖权的冲突成为解决国际法碎片化问题的重要课题之一。MOXPlant案呈现了国际司法机构的多样化所带来平行管辖权之间的冲突对国际法的影响。此案显示在条约中设置协调管辖冲突的条款无疑能够减轻它的碎片化;同时改变国际法庭的自足性亦是缓解管辖冲突的有效途径;尊重其它国际法庭的管辖权可以解决特定的管辖冲突。尽管如此,各国际司法机构之间的平行管辖权与其建立的零散无序决定了国际司法权力的不成体系短期内将难以根本解决,而创设一个国际冲突法庭成为有效解决国际司法权力冲突的一个较为理想的长期方案。 There exists no homogeneous system of international law because it consists of erratic blocks and elements,different partial systems,and universal,regional,or even bilateral subsystems and subsub systems of different levels of legal integration.The system of international law has become increasingly fragmented,particularly since it has developed in recent decades.Such an 'unorganized system' is full of intra-systematic tensions,contradictions and frictions.The MOX Plant case demonstrates the conflicts between international tribunals which are resulted from proliferation of international courts and tribunals.The harmo nization of jurisdictions of different international tribunals is tough and critical for integrating fragmentation of international law.
作者 杨永红
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期107-114,共8页 The Jurist
关键词 国际法的不成体系 国际司法机构的扩散 专属管辖 强制管辖 选择管辖 Fragmentation of International Law Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals Exclusive Jurisdiction Compulsory Jurisdiction Optional Jurisdiction
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1G.Hafner, "Risks Ensuring from Fragmentation of International Law", Official Records of the C.enera/Assembly (A/55/10), annex.
  • 2G. Harrier, "Pro or Cons Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law", 2.5 Michigan Journal of International law (2004), p. 849.
  • 3A.Cassese, International Law, (2nd ed.), London: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp.144-150.
  • 4Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, Fragmentation of law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law, pp.415 - 435.
  • 5Tullio Treves, "Conflicts between the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the International Court of Justice", 31 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics (1999), pp.809-821.
  • 6C.Romano, The Profliferation of Intemational Judicial Bodies: the Pieces and the Puzzle, 31 NYU Journal of International Law and Policies (1999), p.709.
  • 7Prosecutor v.Tadic, "Decision on the Defense Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction", Case No. IT-94-1-AR72, Former Yugo. (1995), p. 11.
  • 8ITLOS, MOX Plant, Request for Provisional Measures, available at http://www.itlos.org.
  • 9OSPAR arbitral tribunal, MOX Rant, final award, available at hnp://www.pca-cpa.org.
  • 10Case C-459/03, Commission v.Ireland, Judgment of May 30, 2006, available at http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang= en.

二级参考文献10

  • 1[1]路透社伦敦4月19日电.日韩岛屿争端由来已久[N].参考消息,2006-04-20(1).
  • 2[2]韩联社首尔4月19日电.日韩岛屿之争骤然升级[N].参考消息,2006-04-20(1).
  • 3[3]张敏,金东光.韩国拒绝将海洋勘测争端送交国际法庭[EB/OL].http://www.sina.com.cn,2006-04-20.
  • 4[4]马宁.主权问题拒绝"租借"[N].北京青年报,2003-01-06(6).
  • 5[5]京翼.李登辉竟称钓鱼岛归日本[N].环球时报,2002-09-30(10).
  • 6[6]Marianne P.Gaertner.The Dispute Settlement Provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea:Critique and Alternatives to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea[J].San Diego Law Review(Vol.19),1982.
  • 7[10]ITLOS,The MOX Plant Case,Order,3 December 2001.
  • 8[12]国际法院.所有案件[EB/OL].www.icj-cij.org,2006-05-09.
  • 9[15]ICJ.Report of the International Court of Justice (1 August 1999-31 July 2002)[EB/OL].http://www.un.org/chinese/law/icj/index.htm,2006-05-10.
  • 10余敏友.《论国际法在解决国际争端方面的发展》[M].,.第251页.第254页.

共引文献29

同被引文献177

引证文献12

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部