期刊文献+

胸腹联合伤与胸腹多发伤的比较研究 被引量:1

Comparative Study of Thoracoabdominal Combined Injuries and Thoracoabdominal Multiple Injuries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较胸腹联合伤(TACI)和胸腹多发伤(TAMI)的临床特点和伤情,以指导创伤的救治。方法167例胸腹腔脏器同时损伤的患者,根据膈肌是否损伤,分为TACI组和TAMI组,比较两组的损伤情况和临床特点,并应用创伤评分系统进行创伤严重度评估。结果全组死亡16例,总死亡率为9.6%。其中TACI组,死亡5例(14.3%),TAMI组11例(8.3%)。胸腹联合伤组与胸腹多发伤组间生理评分RTS、解剖评分中胸部AIS差异无统计学意义,但腹部AIS胸腹联合伤组高,GCS胸腹联合伤组高,ISS胸腹多发伤组高,均有统计学意义。结论TACI和TAMI在临床进程、伤情轻重及治疗结果等方面都有明显的差别,应采取相应的治疗措施,减少并发症,改善预后。 Objective To compare the clinical features and severity of thoracoabdominal combined injuries (TACI) and thoracoabdominal multiple injuries(TAMI) so as to guide the diagnosis and management of trauma. Methods A total of 167 cases of chest trauma complicated by abdominal trauma were reviewed and divided into two groups. Group TACI( 132 cases) was associated with diaphragmatic rupture but group TAMI(35 eases)not, The injury features and the clinical characteristics of both groups were analyzed and the trauma severity of two groups evaluated by trauma score system. Results The overall mortality was 9.6 %( 16/167)of all the cases. The mortality was 14.3% in group TACI (5/35)and 8.3% in group TAMI(11/132). There was no significant difference in revised trauma score(RTS) and thoracic Abbreviated Injury Scale(AIS) between the two groups(P 〉 0.05 ), but the patients in the TACI group had higher Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)and abdominal AIS (P 〈 0.05 ), and the patients in the TACI group had higher injury severity scale (ISS) (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion TACI and TAMI have difference in clinical characteristics, injury severity and treatment results. So it is necessary to take different measurements to reduce the complications and improve the prognosis.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2009年第17期3-4,6,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 胸部损伤 腹部损伤 多发伤 联合伤 创伤评分 Thoracic injuries Abdominal injuries Multiple trauma Combined injuries Trauma scores
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Greanspan L, McLeUan BA, Greig H. Abbreviated injury score and injury severity score: a scoring chart[J]. J Trauma, 1985,25 ( 1 ) : 60264.
  • 2刘维永.论当前严重胸部创伤早期救治中的几个问题[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(1):53-56. 被引量:52
  • 3Kennedy F,Sharif S. Emergency room thoracotomy: a single surgeon's thirteen-year experience[J]. Am Surg,2000,66( 1 ) :56-60.
  • 4Aihara R,Millham FH,Blansfield J,et al. Emergency room thoracotomy for penetrating chest injury, effect of an institutional protocol[J]. J Tranma, 2001,50(6) : 1027-1030.
  • 5Hirshberg A,Wall MJ Jr,Allen MK,et al. Double jeopardy:thoracoabdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention in both chest and abdomen[J]. J Trauma, 1995,39 (2) : 225-229.
  • 6Asensio JA,Arroyo HJr,Veloz W,et al. Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries:ongoing dilemma-which cavity and when?[J]. World J Surg, 2002, 26 (5) : 539-543.
  • 7高劲谋.胸部创伤救治进展[J].中华创伤杂志,1999,15(2):157-158. 被引量:82
  • 8罗春生,张石江,景华,常春林,高声甫,周采璋,胡小南,李忠东.重症胸外伤致急性呼吸窘迫综合征30例[J].中华创伤杂志,2000,16(4):225-227. 被引量:32
  • 9柳垂亮,李玉娟,招伟贤.液体复苏与免疫[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2004,13(11):788-790. 被引量:11
  • 10王正国.多发伤的救治[J].中华创伤杂志,2004,20(1):1-3. 被引量:280

二级参考文献71

共引文献449

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部