江浙粤疾病预防控制机构物力资源状况调查研究

Comparative study of material resources allocation in Jiangsu,Zhejiang and Guangdong disease prevention and control institutions

目的:对江浙粤三省疾病预防控制体系物力资源状况进行比较研究,为卫生行政部门进行合理资源配置提供依据。方法:利用江浙粤三省卫生年鉴和疾控中心年鉴数据进行比较研究。结果:通过三省疾控体系物力资源情况比较可以看出:①广东疾控工作用房面积最大,江苏次之;江苏省级疾控机构工作用房和实验室用房面积和增幅最大。②广东省级疾控机构对房屋建设呈高水平持续投入,浙江以低水平持续投入,江苏仅在2004年一次性投入。③房屋建设单位资金自筹情况江苏最多。设备建设方面,广东疾控仪器设备资产总值最高,江苏第二,江苏市级增幅最大,浙江县级增幅最大。省市县三级仪器设备2005年比2002年提高幅度江苏最高。结论:江浙粤三省中,江苏各级疾控房屋设施和设备资产都有较大幅度增长,但自筹资金较多,造成一定隐患,建议政府有计划长期给予必要的投入。

Objective： To compare the material resources allocation in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Guangdong disease prevention and control institutions and find problem in order to present external evidence to program rationally the hygiene financial resources of diseases control and prevention institutions. Methods： The analysis was done by the data ＂Guangdong, Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces Yearbook of Health and Disease Prevention and Control Center Yearbook＂. Results： In 2001-2005, compared with the material resources of three disease prevention and control institutions, the results were as follows： （1） Housing construction： ①Construction work space area of Guangdong institution was the largest, followed by Jiangsu. Area and increase of Jiangsu provincial construction work space and laboratory space agencies at all levels were the largest. ②Guangdong provincial housing construction investment was a high level of sustained investment, continued low level of investment to Zhejiang and Jiangsu in 2004, only a onetime investment. ③Housing units in the building of self-financing situation in Jiangsu was the most serious. （2） Equipment construction： ①The total assets of equipments of Guangdong institutions at all levels were the highest, second in Jiangsu. The largest increases at the provincial and municipal levels were Jiangsu, and the largest increase at the county level was in Zhejiang. ② A-type equipment in the three provinces had reached an overall provincial standards. B-type Jiangsu and Zhejiang, Jiangsu disease prevention and control institutions at all levels of housing facilities and equipment assets were the size of a big increase, and A and B type instrument configurations were good. But the proportion of self-financing in the purchase of Housing construction and equipments still accounted for a large, more hidden, so the Government need to provide a continuity of investment.