期刊文献+

上游垄断条件下纵向一体化的排斥效应——中国铝业公司案例分析 被引量:4

Repelling Effect of Vertical Integration under Upstream Monopoly——The Case of CHINALCO
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于中国铝业公司纵向并购的环境和行为特征,构建"上游寡头竞争、下游完全竞争"的两阶段博弈模型,对纵向一体化的排斥效应进行了分析。结论认为,中铝并购电解铝企业对其他独立下游企业具有明显的排斥效应,但这种排斥效应随中铝在上游部门垄断程度的降低而变弱,而纵向并购在一定程度上缓解了变弱程度。中铝纵向一体化的长远目标是尽可能控制铝土矿稀缺资源,并层层利用上游垄断的纵向排斥效应,最终在技术含量高的铝深加工环节上形成垄断优势。 Based on the environment and characteristic of vertical merger in CHINALCO, this paper establishes a two-stage model with an upstream monopoly and a downstream competition, and analyses the repelling effect of vertical integration. The model suggests the forward integration of CHINALCO has obvious repelling effects, hut the repelling effect becomes smaller with the reduction of upstream monopoly, and the vertical merger alleviates the diminishing degree. The long-range goal of vertical integration in CHINALCO is to controls the bauxite mining as far as possible, and forms the monopoly advantage on fabrication processes and products using the foreclosure of upstream monopoly one by one.
作者 黄健柏 兰勇
机构地区 中南大学商学院
出处 《系统工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期13-18,共6页 Systems Engineering
基金 教育部国际金融危机应对研究应急课题(2009JYJR03)
关键词 上游垄断 纵向一体化 排斥效应 Upstream Monopoly Vertical Integration Repelling Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Ordover J A, Saloner G, Salop S C. Equilibrium vertical foreclosure[J]. American Economic Review, 1990,80(1):127- 142.
  • 2Rey P, Tirole J A. Primer on foreclosure [Z]. Armstrong M, Porter R H. Handbook of industrial rrganization (Vol. 3) [Z]. New York : North-Holland, 2003.
  • 3Shepherd W G, Shepherd J M. The economics of industrial organization (5th ed. )[M]. Long Grove, IL : Waveland Press, 2004.
  • 4Carlton D W, Perloff J M. Modern industrial organization (3rd ed. )[M]. Reading,MA:Addison Wesley Longman,Inc. , 2000.
  • 5Thomas G K ,Steven C S. Anticompetitive exclusion: raising Rivals: costs to achieve power over price[J]. Yale Law Journal, 1986,96 : 209 - 293.
  • 6Martin S. Advanced industrial economics[M]. Cambridge, MA : Blackwell Publisher, 1993.
  • 7Scherer F M, Ross D. Industrial market structure and economic performance (3rd ed. )[M]. Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin, 1990.
  • 8Volker N, Lucy W. Do vertical mergers facilitate upstream collusion ?[J]. American Economic Review, 2007,97 (4) : 1321- 1339.
  • 9Salinger M A. Vertical merger and market foreclosure [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1988,103(2): 345-356.
  • 10Riordan M, Salop S. Evaluating vertical merger:a Post-Chicago approach[J].Antitrust Law Journal, 1995,63:513-568.

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部