期刊文献+

红鳞蒲桃开花物候特性研究 被引量:13

Flowering phenology characteristics of Syzygium hancei
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对红鳞蒲桃种群的花期物候,单株、单个花序、单花的开花动态进行系统的观测研究,详细测量并记录花部构件,同时调查红鳞蒲桃种群的同花期植物。结果表明:红鳞蒲桃种群的花期物候为8月1日~9月15日(2008年),持续时间46d;单株花期从23d到33d不等;单花序的花期情况较为复杂,总体表现为花朵数越多,该花序持续时间越长,但也有个别情况出现,在开花中期花序持续时间长,开花后期花序持续时间最短,开花前期花序持续时间介于两者之间;在整个种群花期内单花平均开花时间约5.2d,种群开花前期单花的持续时间约为6.7d,开花中期约为4.7d,末花期约为4.3d,种群开花前期单花的持续时间显著大于种群中后期的持续时间。红鳞蒲桃种群的同花期植物隶属于16科21属22种。 The flowering phenology, flowering dynamic of single plant, inflorescence and flowers of Syzygium hancei populations as well as components of single flower were observed. Simultaneously, the plants with same inflorescence in Syzygium hancei population were investigated. The results showed that flowering phenology of Syzygium bancei population lasted for 45 days, from August 1st, 2008 to September 9th, 2008; flowering of single plant ranged from 23 to 33 days. Flowering situation of single inflorescence was more complicated. Generally speaking, the more flowers there were, the longer inflorescence duration lasted. At early flowering stage, inflorescence lasted for a long time, and a short time at peak flowering stage, while inflorescence was secondary at the late flowering stage. For the population flowering,the average flowering stage of single flower was 5.2 days, single flower lasted for about 6.7 days at earlier stage, about 4.7 days at the intermediate stage, and about 4.3 days at the last stage. Therefore, the flowering duration of single flower at early stage of population flowering was longer than that at middle and late stages of population flowering. The plants with same flowering belonged to 22 species of 21 genera, 16 families.
机构地区 广西大学林学院
出处 《广西农业科学》 CAS CSCD 2009年第5期552-555,共4页 Guangxi Agricultural Sciences
基金 广西大学引进人才项目(X081095)
关键词 红鳞蒲桃 花期物候 开花动态 调查 Syzygium hancei flowering phenology flowering dynamics investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献61

  • 1陈学森,李扬,束怀瑞.果树开花授粉生物学研究进展[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,31(3):345-348. 被引量:46
  • 2李昆,陈玉德,谷勇,张志均,侯彬.云南野生余甘子果实类群及其分布特点研究[J].林业科学研究,1994,7(6):606-611. 被引量:34
  • 3陈兴崇.南海区发展滨海旅游的优势和对策.南海海洋资源开发战略高级研讨会论文集[M].,2000,11..
  • 4HARDING J S, BENFIELD E F, BOSTAD P V, et al. Stream biodiversity :The ghost of land use past[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1998,95:14834-14847.
  • 5PETTS G E. Historical analysis of fluvial hydrosystems [ A ]. Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe [C]. Chichester : Wiley, 1989.
  • 6STALNAKER C, LAMB B L, HENRIKSON J. The instream flow methodology: A primer for IFIM. Biological Report 29 [R]. Washington D C: US Department of Interior, National Biological Service, 1995.
  • 7MILNER,N J, HEMSWORTH R J, JONES B E. Habitat evaluation as a fisheries management tool [ J ], Journal of Fish Biology, 1985, 27(Suppl A):85-108.
  • 8ALLAN J D, ERICKSON D L, FAY J. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales [ J]. Freshwater Biology, 1997, 37 ( 1 ) :149-161.
  • 9CREED I F, BAND L E, FOSTER N W, et al. Regulation of nitrate release from temperate forests- a test of the N flushing hypothesis[ J ], Water Resources Research, 1996,32 : 171-184.
  • 10SARAH E G L, MONICA G T, JAMES R M, et al. Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems [ J ]. Aquatic Science, 2001, 64:118-128.

共引文献40

同被引文献176

引证文献13

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部