期刊文献+

核素心肌灌注显像在冠心病危险度分层中的临床意义 被引量:8

Clinical significance of risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease using nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价核素心肌灌注显像在冠心病危险度分层中的临床价值及意义。方法对均进行了核素心肌灌注显像[核素选用^99mTc-甲氧基异腈(MIBI),心肌灌注显像采用静息-腺苷药物负荷试验]及冠状动脉(简称冠脉)造影的13例患者进行观察和对比,对核素心肌灌注显像阳性者10例、核素心肌灌注显像阴性者3例与各自的冠脉造影对比,评判核素心肌灌注显像对胸闷、胸痛等不同症状患者心肌缺血程度初步估测,并进行危险评估。结果核素心肌灌注显像提示严重心肌缺血6例,在相应冠脉造影中均发现冠脉病变多为2支以上,且狭窄程度多在70%以上,均进一步行球囊扩张和(或)支架置入术;提示轻度心肌缺血4例,随后冠脉造影发现多为1支病变,狭窄程度多为50%~70%,均进行药物治疗;另3例核素心肌灌注显像阴性者冠脉造影无明显异常发现。结论核素心肌灌注显像对冠心病进行危险度分层及选择治疗、评估预后有重要意义。 Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease using nuclear myocardial Perfusion imaging. Methods Resting and stress (adenosine infusion) myocardial perfusion studies (^99mTc- MIBI) were performed in 13 patients with chest pain and discomfort for risk stratification. All patients underwent coronary angiography. Results Six patients had severe myocardial ischemia demonstrated by myocardial perfusion study. All six patients had multi-vessel coronary artery disease involving 2 or more coronary arteries with stenosis of more than 70%. The patients underwent coronary angioplasty with coronary artery stents. Four patients had mild ischemia and coronary angiography showed 50%-70% stenosis in one coronary artery. Three patients had no ischemia by myocardial perfusion study and coronary artery angiography showed no significant coronary artery disease. Three-month to one-year follow-up showed satisfactory results. Conclusion Nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging plays an important role in the selection of treatment and prediction of prognosis in coronary artery disease.
作者 应红
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期1500-1501,I0003,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 核素显像 冠状动脉造影 冠心病危险度分层 心肌灌注 nuclear imaging coronary angiography stratification of coronary artery disease myocardial perfusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献6

  • 1Mohiuddin SM, Ravage CK, Esterbrooks DJ, et al. The comparative safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging in women versus men.Pharmacotherapy, 1996, 16:646-651.
  • 2Marwick T, Willemart B, D′Hondt AM, et al. Selection of the optimal nonexercise stress for the evaluation of ischaemic regional myocardial dysfunction and malperfusion. Circulation, 1993,87:345-354.
  • 3Verani MS, Mahmarian JJ, Hixson JB, et al. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by controlled coronary vasodilation with adenosine and thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise.Circulation,1990,82:80-87.
  • 4Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Schwaiger M, et al. Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry.J Am Coll Cardiol,1994,23:384-389.
  • 5Kapur A,Latus KA,Davies G,et al. A comparison of three radionuclide myocardial perfusion tracers in clinical practice: the ROBUST study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2002, 29:1608-1616.
  • 6Gupta NC, Esterbrooks DJ,Hilleman DE,et al. Comparison of adenosine and exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging. The GE SPECT Multicenter Adenosine Study Group.J Am Coll Cardiol ,1992,19:248-257.

共引文献80

同被引文献93

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部