新自由主义为什么没能成为全球普遍模式

Why Didn't Neo-liberalism Become a Universal Pattern?

新自由主义最新形态的"华盛顿共识"的核心内容是"快速的私有化"、"快速的自由化"、"快速的政府的角色最小化"。尽管西方国家一直以来向全球积极推行新自由主义,但迄今为止,没有也不能成为全球普遍模式。究其原因:从理论上说,它不符合当代经济社会发展的总的历史趋势。从实践上看,社会主义国家不能放弃公有制经济,不能没有政府宏观调控,搞私有化;就连资本主义国家实行新自由主义,也会导致经济生活混乱。哪个国家接受新自由主义模式,哪个国家最终会掉入陷阱,带来灾难。

The cores of ＂Washington Consensus＂, the latest form of neo-tiberalism, are ＂fast privatization＂, ＂fast liberalization＂ and ＂fast minimization of government＇s role＂. Though strongly promoted by the Western countries, neo-liberalism, up to now, has not yet become a universal pattern for reasons that, in theory, it is incompatible with the general historical trend of the development of modern economy and society, and that, in practice, socialist countries will give up neither public ownership nor the governmental macro-adjustment and control to give way to privatization. Even in capitalist countries where neo-liberalism is practised, chaos may occur in economic life. The pattern of neo-liberalism may get those countries where it is adopted trapped, even bring them disasters.