摘要
从实体性和程序性的机制上有效约束和控制法官的自由裁量权,是实现司法公正和人权保障价值的必然要求。然而,我国将量刑权的制约问题囿于实体法研究的领域,没有从程序制约这一维度审思制约量刑权的有效对策,所以难以从根本上克减量刑失当的现象。由于我国的国情和法制传统,导致我国的量刑程序改革不可能全盘移植英美国家的独立量刑模式,唯许多大陆法系国家所倡导的"审判二分法"才是克服"水土不服"的良药。我们应该以此为基点,充分吸收和借鉴独立量刑模式的合理要素,继续发扬大陆法系自身的传统优势,不断推进和完善我国的量刑程序制度改革,建立相应的本土化的量刑程序控制机制。
Constraining effectively and controlling judge's discretion in the substantive and procedural mechanisms are the inevitable requirements to realize judicial justice and the value of the human rights. However, theoretical research on jurisprudence in this field in China is still in "a leg walk" state. Restric- tion problem of sentencing power is limited in the filed of substantive law research, instead, thinking of the effective countermeasures of restricting penalty power from procedural restriction's dimension, so it's difficult to reduce inappropriate sentencing radically. Therefore, it is exigent to strengthen the research on procedure restriction mechanism from criminal integration's view. This paper investigates procedure re- striction modes of measuring penalty right of Anglo-American law system and continental law system. At last, sentencing procedure restriction mechanism of constructing localization is adopted.
出处
《福建警察学院学报》
2009年第3期92-96,共5页
Journal of Fujian Police College
关键词
刑罚裁量权
程序制约模式
比较法考察
本土化建构
measuring penalty right
procedure restriction modes
a view of comparative law
local construction