期刊文献+

战斗机综合效能的多属性评估方法 被引量:1

A Multi-attribute Assessment Method for Synthetic Effectiveness of Fighters
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于多属性决策理论,建立了一种战斗机综合效能的多属性评估框架。评估属性包括:飞机机动性,几何完善性,结构完善性,续航性,飞机使用保障技术特性,武器、火控和航空电子系统特性,以及全寿命周期费用。综合效能评估采用TOPS IS方法,回避了将各评估参数综合成单一效能度量值的困难。采用最小信息折衷评估方法确定属性权重。对F-15C、F-16A、F-18A三种战斗机的综合效能进行了评估、对比。 Based on multi-attribute decision-making theory, a multi-attribute assessment framework for synthetic effectiveness of fighters is presented. The attribute set used in effectiveness assessment comprises seven factors, i.e. , aircraft maneuverability, geometric perfection level, structural perfection level, endurable flight characteristics, technological characteristics in operation and support stage, capabilities of weapon and fire control as well as avionics systems, and life cycle cost. The TOPSIS method is adopted to assess the synthetic effectiveness, which can evade the problem of synthesizing various assessment parameters into a single effectiveness measure. The weights of different attributes are determined by using Minimal Information Trade-off Assessment (MITA) method. Finally, the synthetic effectiveness of F-15C, F-16A and F-18A fighters are assessed and compared.
出处 《火力与指挥控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期15-19,共5页 Fire Control & Command Control
基金 航空科学基金资助项目(03J51055)
关键词 战斗机 效能评估 多属性决策 TOPSIS fighter, effectiveness assessment, multi-attribute decision making(MADM), TOPSIS
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1朱宝鎏 朱荣昌 熊笑非.作战飞机效能评估[M].北京:航空工业出版社,1993..
  • 2吴志革译.[美]陆军武器装备司令部.系统分析与费用效能分析[M].北京:兵器工业部兵器系统工程研究所,1971.
  • 3Hwang C L,Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications: A State-of-the- Art Surveys [M ]. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.
  • 4Gabbert P, Brown D E. Knowledge-Based Computer-Aided Design of Materials Handling Systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1989,19 : 188-196.
  • 5谭小卫,方卫国.一种新的飞机作战效能评估方法[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(1):75-80. 被引量:14
  • 6Matthews D F. Program Management Course Lecture Notes [M]. Naval Postgraduate School, 2001.
  • 7Numan Y. Major Weapon Systems Acquisition and Life-cycle Cost Estimation: A Case Study [D]. Naval Postgraduate School, 2001.
  • 8Sen P. Communicating Preferences in Multiplecriteria Decision-making:the Role of the Designer [J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2001, 12z 15- 24.
  • 9Islei G, Loekett A G. Judgmental Modelling Based on Geometric Least Square[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1988, 36: 27-35.
  • 10Sen P, Yang J B. Design Decision Making Based upon Multiple Attribute Evaluations and Minimal Preference Information [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 1994, 20: 107-124.

二级参考文献4

  • 1王丕宏,张红.作战效能分析研究[J].电光与控制,1995,2(4):15-19. 被引量:13
  • 2唐必铭 盛永才 韩翠英 译 [俄]安采利奥维奇著.飞机可靠性、安全性和生存性[M].北京:宇航出版社,1993.9-19.
  • 3吴志革 译.系统分析与费用效能分析[M].[美]陆军武器装备司令部,兵器工业部兵器系统工程研究所,1971.33-42.
  • 4朱宝鎏 朱荣昌 熊笑非.作战飞机效能评估[M].北京:航空工业出版社,1993..

共引文献131

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部