期刊文献+

基于Granger因果检验的新疆产业结构变动与经济增长关系分析 被引量:8

Analysis on Granger Causality Test between the Adjustments of Industrial Structure and Economic Growth in Xinjiang
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章应用协整和格兰杰因果检验等经济计量分析方法,对新疆1978~2006年的产业结构变动与经济增长的关系进行了分析,并利用宏观经济模型测算了产业变动对新疆经济增长的贡献。实证分析结果表明:产业结构变动促进了经济增长,而经济增长对产业结构变动没有显著影响。产业结构变动对经济增长的贡献水平还较低。需要制订有效的产业政策优化调整产业结构,以促进新疆经济的快速发展。 Using the Granger causality test and linear economic models, this paper analyzed the relationship between the adjustment of Xinjiang's industrial structure and economic growth in the past 29 years. The Granger causality test shows that the adjustment of industrial structure is the important reason of real economic growth, but the economic growth has no obvious effect on the adjustment of industrial structure. The secondary industry have a greater contribution to economic growth, but the adjustment of industrial structure have a poor contribution to economic growth The industrial policy of the industrial structure adjustment and optimization is needed.
出处 《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第7期33-35,55,共4页 Ecological Economy
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(07&ZD028) 国家社会科学基金项目(08BRK006)
关键词 产业结构 经济增长 GRANGER因果分析 industrial structure economic growth Granger causality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1刘伟,李绍荣.产业结构与经济增长[J].中国工业经济,2002(5):14-21. 被引量:554
  • 2Engle R F, Granger C W J. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing [J]. Ecomometrical 1987, 55(2): 251-276.
  • 3Granger C W J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and gross spectral methods [J]. Econometrica, 1981, 57: 424-438.
  • 4Dickey A D, Fuller W A. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root [J]. Econometreca, 7981, 49(4), 355-367.
  • 5葛新元,王大辉,袁强,方福康.中国经济结构变化对经济增长的贡献的计量分析[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(1):43-48. 被引量:97
  • 6Denison E F. Why growth rates differ [M]. New York: The Brookings Institution, 1976: 286.
  • 7西蒙·库兹涅茨.各国的经济增长——总产值和生产结构[M].常勋,潘天顺,黄有土,等,译.北京:商务印书馆,1985.30-45.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Baxter, Marianne, Fiscal Policy, Specialization, and Trade in the Tow-sector Model: The Return of Rieardo?, The Journal of Political Economy, 1992, 100, 713-744.
  • 2Beason, Richard and David E. Weinstein, Growth, Economies of Scale, and Targeting in Japan (1955-1990), The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1996, 78, 285-295,
  • 3Bedrossian, Arakel and Demetrios Moschos, Industrial Structure, Concentration and the Speed of Price Adjustment,Journal of Industrial Economics, 1988, 36, 459-475.
  • 4Chenery, Hollis B., Patterns of Industrial Growth, The American Economic Review, 1960, 50, 624-654.
  • 5Dasgupta, Partha and Joseph Stiglitz, Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity, The Economic Journal,1980, 266-293:
  • 6Dasgupta, Partha and Joseph Stiglitz, Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D, The Bell Journal of Economics, 1980, 11, 1-28.
  • 7Gabel, H. Landis, A Simultaneous Equation Analysis of the Structure and Performance of the United States Petroleum Refining Industry, Journal of Industrial Economics, 1979, 28, 89-104.
  • 8George, Kenneth D, Concentration and Specialization in Industry, Journal of Industrial Economics, 1972, 20, 107-121.
  • 9George, Kenneth D, The Changing Structure of Competitive Industry, The Economic Journal, 1972, 82, 353-368.
  • 10Gregory, Paul and James M. Griffin, Secular and Cross-Section Industrialization Patterns: Some Further Evidence on the Kuznets-Chenery Cotitroversy, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1974, 56, 360-368.

共引文献631

同被引文献61

引证文献8

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部