期刊文献+

改良CHOP方案治疗高龄人非霍奇金淋巴瘤15例 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良CHOP方案治疗高龄中、高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者的疗效以及治疗相关不良反应。方法15例高龄中、高度恶性NHL患者(年龄均〉80岁),第1天:环磷酰胺200mg/m2,吡柔比星20mg/m2,长春新碱0.6mg/m2;第1至第5天:泼尼松30mg/m2;每3~4周为1个周期,化疗4-8个周期后观察患者临床症状、体征,并监测血常规、血生化、心电图等。结果15例患者中,完全缓解(CR)7例,部分缓解(PR)5例,总有效率(CR+PR)为80.0%,常见不良反应为肺部感染、白细胞减少等,但均未影响化疗。结论高龄NHL患者采用改良CHOP方案治疗可获得较满意疗效,且患者不良反应轻微,可进一步临床应用观察。
出处 《白血病.淋巴瘤》 CAS 2009年第6期363-364,共2页 Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Hartge P, Devesa SS. Quantification of the impact of known risk factors on time trends in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma incidence. Cancer Res, 1992, 52: 5566s-5569s.
  • 2Bairey O, Benjamini O, Blickstein D, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients 80 years of age or older. Ann Oncol, 2006, 17: 928-934.
  • 3马一盖,徐韶华.CHOP为主的化疗方案治疗中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤疗效评价[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2001,10(6):346-348. 被引量:2
  • 4TireHi U, Errante D, van Glabbeke M, et al. CHOP is the standard regimen in patients ≤70 years of age with intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma:results of a randomised study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998. 16: 27-34.
  • 5陈建祥,双跃荣,王迪进,樊光华,万莉娟.吡喃阿霉素、表阿霉素为主方案治疗非霍奇淋巴瘤的临床观察[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2004,13(3):168-169. 被引量:6

二级参考文献12

  • 1徐农,孙琳,蔡菊芬,范云,钟海均.以吡喃阿霉素为主的联合化疗治疗恶性肿瘤51例的临床疗效[J].实用肿瘤杂志,1996,11(5):216-218. 被引量:3
  • 2孙燕,张湘茹,张弘纲,张和平,孙国光.以表阿霉素为主的化疗方案治疗晚期恶性肿瘤516例[J].中华内科杂志,1997,36(3):183-186. 被引量:21
  • 3Agata N, Hirano S, Hara Y, et aL A comparison of pirarubicin with other anthracyclines on the cardiovascular system [J].Pharmacometrics, 1991,41 (5):467 -474.
  • 4Nielsen D, Jensen J B, Dombernowsky P,et al. Epirubicin cardiotoxicity: a study of 135 patients with advanced breast cancer [J]. J Clini Oncol, 1990 , 8(11) : 1806-1810.
  • 5SuzukiM HironoM MajimaH etal.Cardiotoxicity due to prolonged Administration of THP[J].癌と化学法,1997,24(13):1993-1999.
  • 6Shipp M,Yeap B,Harrington D,et al.The m-BACOD combination chemotherapy regimen in large-cell lymphoma: Analysis of the completed atrial and comparison with the M-BACOD regimen[].Journal of Clinical Oncology.1990
  • 7Longo D L,De Vita V T,Jr. Duffey P L,et al.Superiority of ProMACE-CytaBOM over ProMACE-Mopp in the treatment of advanced diffuse aggressive lymphoma: Result of a prospective randomized trial[].Journal of Clinical Oncology.1991
  • 8Shipp M A,Harrington D,et al.International non-Hodgkin’ s lymphoma prognostic factors project : A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’ s lymphoma[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1993
  • 9Fisher R I,Gaynor E R,Dahlerg S,et al.Comparison of a standard regimen ( CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin’ s lymphoma[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1993
  • 10Gorndon L,Harrington D,Anderson J,et al.Comparison of a second-generation combination chemotherapy regimen ( m-BACOD) with a standard regimen ( CHOP) for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin’ s lymphoma[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1992

共引文献5

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部