期刊文献+

材料的“本性”与“真实性”——材料问题的观念性层面初探 被引量:10

"Nature" and "Truth" of Material-A Study on the Conceptual Aspects of the Problem of Material
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "本性"和"真实性"是有关材料问题中观念性思考的重要范畴。"本性"更多是对于材料本身的思考,核心在于一物如何成为自己;而"真实性"则往往是对于建造中的材料的认识和讨论,其核心是一种材料是否可以模仿别的材料,还是必须在每一个方面尤其是在形式方面表达自己的独特属性。本文意在通过历史向度的考察和理论维度的思考,呈现材料"本性"与"真实性"的多重内涵以及介入它们的多重可能,并由此揭示二者的象征性实质,以及它们在不同历史时期含义上的相对性。对于"本性"与"真实性"性质的这一认定便就疏离了近现代以来的传统观念,更为看重人的因素的介入对于材料性质的显现所具有的意义。此时,材料的"本性"与"真实性"都不再绝对,从而为那种启蒙理性以外的认识提供了可能。 "Nature" and "Truth" are the two most fundamental notions in the conceptual thinking of architectural materials. The former primarily focuses on the thing itself or how a thing comes to be itself while the later concentrates on the material in construction and basically concerns the question if one material can imitate material of another kind or it has to express its peculiar properties in all aspects especially the formal ones. This paper argues against the commonly held simplistic understanding and advocates a more subtle view toward these themes. Based on a historical retrospection and a theoretical study of different understandings, the paper presents the multi-layered connotations of "Nature" and "Truth" as well as the different ways to approach them. Such an investigation reveals the relativity of the concepts of "Nature" and "Truth" and their symbolic nature. This affirmation alienates from the orthodox understanding in modern architecture, placing more stress on human alteration in displaying the "Nature" of materials, depriving the absolutism of the material "Truth" , and new possibilities of studying other than those originated in the Enlightenment are thus opened up.
作者 史永高
出处 《建筑师》 2009年第3期5-17,共13页 The Architect
关键词 材料 观念 本性 真实性 属性表 面结构 Material Concept Nature Truth Property Surface Structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1[英]雷蒙·威廉斯著,刘建基译.关键词:文化与社会的词汇.北京:三联书店,2005.326-327.
  • 2David Leatherbarrow, The Roots of Architectural Invention: site, enclosure, materials( New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 157-158.
  • 3David Leatherbarrow, The Roots of Architectural Invention: sile, enclosure, materials (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 161.
  • 4[英]罗宾·米德尔顿,戴维·沃特金著,邹晓玲等译.新古典主义与19世纪建筑.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2000:5.
  • 5David Leatherbarrow, The Roots of Architectural Invention: site, enclosure, materials (New York: Cambridge University Press, 19931, 184.
  • 6Carlo Lodoli, 转引自 David Leatherbarrow, The Roots of Architectural Invention: site, enclosure, materials (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 189-190.
  • 7Gotlfried Semper, Kleine Schriften, 292. 转引自David Leatherbarrow, The Roots of Architectural Invention: site, enclosure, materials (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 198.
  • 8Gottfried Semper, "On Architectural Styles" , in Gottfried Semper, The Four Elements of Architecture and Other Writings, trans. Harry Francis Mallgrave and Wolfgang Herrmann (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 269.
  • 9[古罗马]维特鲁威著,高履泰译.建筑十书.北京:知识产权出版社,2001.105.
  • 10Karl Botticher, 转引自David Leatherbarrow, The Roots of Architeclural Invention: site, enclosure, materials (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 197.

同被引文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部