期刊文献+

一种OWL本体进化方法 被引量:1

Approach of OWL ontology evolution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对从关系数据库模式学习所得的OWL本体大都是轻量级的,其概念层次结构过于扁平,很难被直接用于实际的本体应用,提出一种新颖的OWL本体进化方法。其通过形式概念分析对已有轻量级OWL本体进行概念聚类,根据概念等同度、概念包含度计算,自动提出丰富、修改本体概念语义关系的建议,从而辅助设计者实现本体进化。该方法将FCA与相似度计算结合使用,既发挥FCA语义强度较高的特点,又发挥相似度计算执行效率高且容易实现的特点;同时,规避了相似度计算语义强度较低与FCA实现较为困难且执行效率较低的不足。一个实例结果的评估证实了该方法的有效性。 OWL ontologies learned from relational database schema are almost lightweight, their concept hierarchies are too horizontal, it is difficult to apply them to construct ontology-based systems directly. Aiming to this new problem, this paper proposed a novel approach for OWL ontology evolution. Based on concept clustering using formal concept analysis, computing con- cept equation measure and concept inclusion measure, made some suggestions to enrich or amend concept hierarchy of ontology automatically to aid designer to achieve ontology evolution. Validation of the approach was done by the evaluation of an experiment result.
出处 《计算机应用研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期2564-2567,共4页 Application Research of Computers
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70671016)
关键词 关系数据库模式 本体进化 概念聚类 OWL本体 relational database schema ontology evolution concept clustering OWL ontology
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1LI Man, DU Xiao-yong, WANG Shan. Learning ontology from relational database[ C]//Proc of the 4th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. 2005:3410-3415.
  • 2许卓明,王琦.一种从关系数据库学习OWL本体的方法[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2006,34(2):208-211. 被引量:17
  • 3ASTROVA I. Extracting ontologies from relational databases [ C ]// Proc of the 22nd IASTED International Conference on Databases and Applications ( DBA ). 2004:56 -61.
  • 4GANTER B, WILLE R. Formal concept analysis:mathematical foundations [ M ]. New York : Springer-Verlag, 1999.
  • 5STUMME G,MAEDCHE A. FCA-Merge:bottom-up merging of ontologies[ C ]//Proc of the 7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2001 : 225-230.
  • 6何娟,高志强,陆青健,瞿裕忠.基于词汇相似度的元素级本体匹配[J].计算机工程,2006,32(16):185-187. 被引量:25
  • 7郑丽萍,李光耀,梁永全.本体映射框架的设计[J].计算机科学,2007,34(10):166-167. 被引量:5
  • 8[ EB/OL ]. http ://soureforge. net/projects/conexp.
  • 9EHRIG M, HAASE P, HEFKE M, et al. Similarity for ontologies: a comprehensive framework [ C ]//Proc of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems. 2005.
  • 10EHRIG M, STAAB S. QOM-quick ontology mapping[ C ]//Proc of the Semantic Web-ISWC 2004. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2004:683-696.

二级参考文献25

  • 1许卓明,苏文萍.关系数据库模式信息的提取[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(2):202-206. 被引量:6
  • 2HENDLER J.Ontologies on the Semantic Web[J].IEEE Intelligent Systems,2002,17(2):73-74.
  • 3BERNERS-LEE T,HENDLER J,LASSILA O.The Semantic Web[J].Scientific American,2001,284(5):34-43.
  • 4STAAB S,MAEDCHE A.Ontology learning for the Semantic Web[J].IEEE Intelligent Systems,2001,16(2):72-79.
  • 5STOJANOVIC L,STOJANOVIC N,VOLZ R.Migrating data-intensive Web Sites into the Semantic Web[C]//Proc of the 17th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing.New York:ACM Press,2002:1100-1107.
  • 6HANDSCHUH S,STAAB S,VOLZ R.Annotation for the Deep Web[J].IEEE Intelligent Systems,2003,18(5):42-48.
  • 7MORENO N,NAVAS I,ALDANA J F.Putting the Semantic Web to work with DB technology[J].IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin,2003,26(4):49-54.
  • 8CHIANG R H L,BARRON T M,STOREY V C.Reverse engineering of relational databases:extraction of an EER model from a relational database[J].Data & Knowledge Engineering,1994,12(2):107-142.
  • 9XU Zhuo-ming,CAO Xiao,DONG Yi-sheng,et al.Formal approach and automated tool for translating ER schemata into OWL ontologies[C]//DAI H,SRIKANT R,ZHANG C.Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.PAKDD 2004 Proceedings,LNAI Vol.3056.Berlin:Springer,2004:464-475.
  • 10Noy N E Musen M A. Anchor-PROMPT: Using Non-local Context for Semantic Matching[C]. Proc. of Ontologies and Information Sharing Workshop, IJCAI, 2001.

共引文献44

同被引文献11

  • 1Zhang W,Yoshida T,Tang X. Using ontology to improve precision of terminology extraction from documents [ J ]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,7 : 9333-9339.
  • 2Honga C M,Chenb C M,Chiua C Y. Automatic extraction of new words based on Google News corpora for supporting lexicon-based Chinese word segmentation systems [ J ]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 3: 3641-3651.
  • 3Brill E. Transform-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging [ J ]. Computation Linguistics, 1995, 21 (4) : 543 -565.
  • 4Zhang Y M, Zhou J F. A Trainable Method for Extracting Chinese Entity Names and Their Relations [ C ]// Proceedings of the Sec2 and Chinese Language Processing Workshop, Hong Kong, 2000: 66-72.
  • 5Chieu H L, Ng H T. Named entity recognition: A maximum entropy approach using global information [ C ]//Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2002:190-196.
  • 6Zelenko D, Aone C, Richardella. A. Kernel methods form relations extraction [ J ]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003,3 : 1080-1106.
  • 7McCallumn A, Li W. Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields [ C ]// Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning,2003.
  • 8冀高峰,汤庸,道炜,吴桂宾,黄帆,王鹏.基于XML的自动学习Web信息抽取[J].计算机科学,2008,35(3):87-90. 被引量:10
  • 9马静,吴一占,刘思峰.基于领域本体的信息抽取模式生成与系统实现[J].情报学报,2008,27(2):193-198. 被引量:8
  • 10于江德,王立新,樊孝忠.基于自扩展的信息抽取模式自动获取[J].小型微型计算机系统,2009,30(5):891-894. 被引量:3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部