期刊文献+

三点比较式臭袋法与动态嗅觉仪法关联性研究 被引量:2

Study on Correlation of Triangle Odor Bag Method and Dynamic Olfactometry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于多数恶臭物质的嗅阈值较低,使其恶臭浓度的测定较为困难。感官测定法因其可直接反映恶臭对人们的影响成为普遍使用的恶臭测定方法。国标方法三点比较式臭袋法存在一些缺陷,而世界上许多发达国家采用高自动化和高准确度的动态嗅觉仪法进行恶臭浓度测定。采用硫化氢和氨气进行实验,将两种方法测定结果进行关联研究,以推动动态嗅觉仪法在我国的应用。研究表明,两种测定方法对硫化氢和氨气的测定结果,具有一定的相关性。此外,在臭气强度的测定上,动态嗅觉仪法表现出更大优越性。 As the olfactory thresholds of most odor substance are low,it is hard to determine odor concentration. Comparing with other methods,the sense organ methods are widely used. Here are still some shortages to the triangle odor bag method, while the dynamic olfactometry with high-automation and high-accuracy is commonly used in the developed countries. Experiments on two typical odor gases-hydrogen sulfide and ammonia are carried out to make some associated research in order to match the use of dynamic olfactometry with the Chinese National Standard. The results showed that certain correlations exist between the determinations of the two single substances by each method, so they can be cross- referred in certain extent. The dynamic olfactometry can also be used in odor intensity determination.
出处 《环境科技》 2009年第3期1-4,共4页 Environmental Science and Technology
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支撑计划(NCET-07-0848)
关键词 测定 恶臭浓度 三点比较式臭袋法 动态嗅觉仪法 Determination Odor concentration Triangle odor bag method Dynamic olfactometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献33

  • 1吴希文,古建国.恶臭污染嗅觉测定法的标准化动向[J].环境与可持续发展,2002,30(4):28-31. 被引量:5
  • 2戴天有,魏复盛,彭清涛,周申范.空气和废气中10种醛酮污染物的高效液相色谱测定[J].环境科学研究,1996,9(6):29-33. 被引量:32
  • 3包志成 张尊 等.空气中C4-C12烃类分析[J].中国环境科学,1986,6(3):74-76.
  • 4全浩.恶臭环境科学词典[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1991.25-30.
  • 5香港环境保护署.香港环境保护[M].,1996.10-20.
  • 6叶能权 陆展荣 等.活性炭管-气相色谱法测定空气中苯及苯系物的研究[J].环境科学,1984,5(1):35-36.
  • 7[1]prEN13725:Air quality - Determination of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometry. 2000.
  • 8[2]Ms.M.Paduch. Draft European standard on determenation of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometer. Edited by Jiang,Proceeding of the national workshop on Odour Measurement standardization[M]. Sydney:UNSW, 1997: 1~9.
  • 9[3]Mannebeck D,and H.Mannebeck. Interlaboratory comparison of dynamic olfactometry in central Europe 2000. Proceeding of 1st IWA International Conference on Odour and VOCs: Measurement, Regulation and Control Techniques Conference Program[M]. Sydney:UNSW, 2001. 31~36.
  • 10[4]J.J.R.Feddes, G.Qu, C.A.Ouellette and J.J.Leonard. Development of an eight-panelist single port, forced-choice, dynamic dilution olfactometer[J]. Candian Biosystems Engineering. 2001, volum43: 6.1~6.5.

共引文献59

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部