期刊文献+

代理人类型差异及其委托代理的实证分析 被引量:5

An Principal-Agency Model Based on the Type Difference of Agent and Its Empirical Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 标准化的委托代理模型并未对代理人类型差异问题进行针对性研究。本文从代理人机会主义倾向存在程度差别的现实判断入手,对基于代理人类型差异的委托代理治理问题进行了尝试性分析。通过对标准化委托代理模型的简要评价以及拓展分析,我们从理论层面证明,区分代理人类型的合约机制,对抑制代理人机会主义倾向从而提高委托人可保证收入或剩余收益等方面具有比较优势。论文利用中国上市公司数据对主要结论所做的实证检验发现,大多数上市公司偏好从内部选择代理人,这种状况在一定程度上显示,从内部选择代理人的决策在短期内有可能提高企业资本投入的回报率。 The standard model of principal and agency didn't do special study on the issue of type difference of agent, based on the realistic jugdement of the degree of the agent's opportunism, this paper do a trial study on the governance of the issue of principal and agency founded on type difference of agent. Through the brief appraisal and expanded analysis of the standard model of principal and agency, we prove on a theoretical view that the contract based on the type of agent has comparative advangtage in the restraining the agent's opportunism and rising the principal's pledgeable income. The empirical study based on the data of the Chinese listed companies tells us that most listed companies has strong clination to choose agents within companies, and the decision of choosing interior agent is in favor of rising the return of capital input in a short run.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期108-118,共11页 China Industrial Economics
关键词 委托代理 代理人类型 机会主义 交易成本 principal and agency type of agent opportunism transaction cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Arrow,K.J. The Limits of Organization[M]. New York: W.W.Norton, 1974.
  • 2Berle,A.A.,and G.C.Means. The Modem Corporation and Private Property [M]. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1932.
  • 3Daniel Kahneman,and Amos Tversky. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk [J]. Econometrica, 19?9,47 (March).
  • 4George A. Akerlof. The Missing Motivation in Macroeconomics[J]. American Economic Review,2007,97(1).
  • 5Jesen,M.C.,and W.H.Meckling. Theory of the Finn: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1976,(3).
  • 6Fama,E. Agency Problem and the Theory of the Firm[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980,(88).
  • 7Holmstrom,Bengt. Moral Hazard and Observability[J]. Bell Journal of Economics,1979,10(Spring).
  • 8Aghion, P.,and Tirole,J. Formal and Real Authority in Organizations[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, (105).
  • 9Shleifer,Andrei,and Vishny,Robert W. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, (94).
  • 10[美]D.诺斯.经济史上的结构和变革[M].厉以平译.北京:商务印书馆,1992.

二级参考文献13

  • 1西蒙.《理性选择行为模型》[A]..《西蒙选集》[C].首都经贸大学出版社,2002年..
  • 2贝克尔.《人类行为经济分析》[M].上海三联书店,1996年..
  • 3休谟.《人类理解研究》[M].商务印书馆,1997年..
  • 4韦森.《习俗的本质与生发机制探源》[A]..《转型与增长》[C].上海远东出版社,2002年..
  • 5卢瑟福.《经济学中的制度:老制度主义与新制度主义》[M].中国社会科学出版社,2000年..
  • 6Conlisk, John, Why Bounded Rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, vol.34 (2), June 1996.
  • 7Simon H. Models of Man. New York: Wiley, 1957.
  • 8Harsanyi J C. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridger University Press, 1977.
  • 9Shiller R J. Market Volatility and Investor Behavior. American Economic Review, vol. 80, no. 2, 1990.
  • 10Delong B, A Shleifer, Summers L & R Waldman, Noistrader Risk in Financial Markets. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (4), 1990.

共引文献160

同被引文献61

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部