期刊文献+

间接受害人精神损害赔偿制度的立法思考 被引量:2

Thinking on the Legislation System of Indirect Victims Spirit Damages Compensation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 间接受害人精神损害是精神损害赔偿制度的重要组成部分,也是近年来各国侵权法备受争论的热点问题。在我国司法实践中,作为间接受害人请求精神损害赔偿的案例屡见不鲜,但我国现行法律对此作出的规定仍存在缺陷,而对此缺陷理论界尚未总结出切实可行的解决办法,无形中为法官审理此类案件设置了障碍。 Spirit damage of the indirect victims is an important component ofthe spirit damage compensation system and has been the hot debating issue in the tort law in every country in recent years. From the judicial practice in China, the cases about spirit damage compensation of the indirect victim are not uncommon, but China's existing laws still have shortcomings and deficiencies and theoretical circles have not a practical solution, which offers an obstacle for judges to hear such cases.
作者 郑倩
出处 《吉林省经济管理干部学院学报》 2009年第3期69-74,共6页 Journal of Jilin Province Economic Management Cadre College
关键词 间接受害人 精神损害 请求权 Indirect victim Moral damage The right to request
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1覃有土,晏宇桥.论侵权的间接损失认定[J].现代法学,2004,26(4):28-33. 被引量:26
  • 2[1]Dan B. Dobbs, The Law of Torts, West Group, 2000.
  • 3[2]Restatement of Torts, 2nd, §46. Outrageous Conduct Causing Severe Emotional Distress (1) One who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other results from it, for such bodily harm.
  • 4[3]§46. Outrageous Conduct Causing Severe Emotional Distress(2) Where such conduct is directed at a third person, the actor is subject to liability if he intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress(a) to a member of such person's immediate family who is present at the time, whether or not such distress results in bodily harm, or(b) to any other person who is present at the time, if such distress results in bodily harm.
  • 5[5]参见Supreme Court of California In Bank. 1989. 48 Cal.3d 644, 771 P.2d 814, 257 Cal.Rptr.865.
  • 6[6]参见Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980. 84 N.J. 88,417 A.2D 521.
  • 7[7]参见Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1987. 534 A.2d 1282.
  • 8[8]参见831 P2d 1197 (Cal. 1992).
  • 9[9]参见Supreme Court of California, 19 Cal.3d 441, 563 P.2d 858
  • 10[10]参见Court of Appeals of California, Fifth Appellate District, 170 Cal. App.3d 975, 216 Cal Rptr 581

共引文献28

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部