期刊文献+

肾功能损伤分级系统在成人心脏术后的应用

Acute renal failure after cardiac surgery in adult patients: evaluation of the ARF-specific scoring systems
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨肾功能损伤分级系统在成人心脏术后的临床应用价值。方法连续收集2006年10月1日至2006年12月31日(以手术日期为准)首次行冠状动脉移植术和(或)瓣膜置换术的509例病人资料。记录性别、年龄、手术类型、围术期血流动力学指标、尿量、血生化指标和临床转归等内容。按照Bellomo评分和AKIN分级系统在心脏手术后分别对病人进行分级、评分。结果509例中男341例(67.0%),女168例(33.0%),平均年龄(56.2±12.0)岁。行冠状动脉移植术309例,瓣膜手术182例,冠状动脉移植术合并瓣膜手术18例。Bellorno评分和AKIN分级ROC曲线下面积分别为0.875和0.923。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,AKIN分级OR值为5.478(P=0.028,95%CI1.027—24.856)。结论ARF是心脏手术后的常见并发症之一,Bellomo评分和AKIN分级系统对心脏手术后ARF病人的住院死亡有良好的预测能力。 Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of two acute renal faffure-specifie scoring systems (the classification by Bellomo et al and the AKIN criteria) for predicting hospital mortality after cardiac surgery in adult patients. Methods Between October 1st 2006 to December 31st 2006, 509 adult patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/ or valve opertion were enrolled in this study. The medical data collection included gender, age, types of operation, perioperative hemadynamic parameters, urine output, biochemical parameters and outcome. Renal function was assessed daffy according to the classification by Bellomo and the AKIN criteria, respectively. As references, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱ and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)score were also calculated. Results Three hundred and forty-one patients were male (67.0%), and 168 were female (33.0%), mean age was (56.2 ± 12.0) years old. Three hundred and nine patients underwent CABG, 182 underwent valve operation and 18 underwent CABG plus valve operation. Mean duratiou of ventilation support was (20.4± 17.7 ) hours, and the I CU stay was ( 1.4 ± 1.0 ) days. Postoperative hospital stay was ( 13.8± 9.1 ) days. According to the classification by BeUomo., the highest in-hospital mortality was 52.9% in ARFS group. Multiplication of in-hospital mortality rate was observed (χ^2 for trend, P 〈 0.01) in 0.4% (non-ARF), 1.2% (stage 1), 12.0% (stage 2) and 32.4% (stage 3) of patients based on the AKIN criteria. By applying the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, the classification by Bellomo and the AKIN criteria had good discriminative power. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis verified that the Odds Ratio of the AKIN criteria was 5.478 (P =0.028, 95% Confidence Interval 1.027- 24.856), after adjusting for gender and age. Conclusion Analytical data confimed good discriminative power of both the AKIN criteria and the classification by Bellomo for predicting hospital mortality of adult postoperative patient with ARF.
出处 《中华胸心血管外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期168-171,共4页 Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
关键词 心脏外科手术 手术后并发症 Bellomo分级 AKIN分级 Cardiac surgical procedures Postoperative complications Kidney Bellomo criteria AKIN criteria
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Abel RM,Buekley MJ,Austen WG,et al.Etiology,incidence,and prognosis of renal failure following cardiac operation.Results of a prospective analysis of 500 consecutive patients.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1976,71:323-333.
  • 2Chertow GM,Lazarus JM,Christiansen CL,et al.Preoperative renal risk stratification.Circulation,1997,95:878-884.
  • 3Llopart T,Lombardi R,Forselledo M,et al.Acute renal failure in open heart surgery.Ren Fail,1997,19:319-323.
  • 4Suen WS,Mok CK,Chiu SW,et al.Risk factors for development of acure,renal failure(ARF) requiring dialysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Angiology,1998,49:789-800.
  • 5Conlon PJ,Stafford-Smith M,White WD,et al.Acuto renal failure following cardiac surgery.Nephrol Dial Transplant,1999,14:1158-1162.
  • 6Knaus WA,Draper EA,Wagner DP,et al.APACHE Ⅱ:a severity of disease classificatiou system.Crit Care Med,1985,13:818-829.
  • 7Knans WA,Wagner DP,Draper EA,et al.The APACHE Ⅲ prognosti system.Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults,Chest,1991,100:1619-1636.
  • 8Moreno R,Vincent JL,Matos R,et al.The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care results of a prospective multicenter study.Intensive Care Med,1999,25:686-696.
  • 9Ronco C,Levin A,Wamock DG,et al.AKIN Working Croup.Improving outcomes from acute kidney injury (AKI):repro cu an initistive.Int J Artif Organ,2007,30:373-376.
  • 10Bellomo R,Ronco C,Kellum JA,et al.The ADQI workgroup:acute renal failure-definition,outcome measures,animal models,fluid therapy and information technology needs:the Second Intemational Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group.Crit Care,2004,8:R204-R212.

二级参考文献37

  • 1陈兵,张璐.危重病患者血乳酸水平与APACHEⅡ评分相关性研究[J].中国急救医学,2006,26(1):63-63. 被引量:35
  • 2郑哲,周游,胡盛寿,高华炜.四种冠状动脉旁路移植术危险因素模型的应用和比较[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(6):504-507. 被引量:10
  • 3Brivet FG, Kleinknecht DJ, Loirat P, et al. Acute renal failure in intensive care units. Causes, outcome, and prognostic factors of hospital mortality: a prospective,multicentre study. Crit Care Med, 1996,24: 192-198.
  • 4Paganini EP, Halstenberg WK, Goormastic M. Risk modelling in acute renal failure requiring dialysis: the introduction of a new model. Clin Nephrol, 1996, 46:206-211.
  • 5Mehta RL, Pascual MT, Gruta CG, et al. Refining predictive models in critically Ill patients with acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002, 13: 1350-1357.
  • 6Douma CE, Redekop WK, Van der Meulen JHP, et al. Predicting mortality in intensive care patients with acute renal failure treated with dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1997, 8: 111-117.
  • 7Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE Ⅱ: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med,1985, 13 :A828-A829.
  • 8Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE Ⅲ prognostic system:risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest,1991, 100: 1619-1636.
  • 9Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score(SAPS Ⅱ ) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA, 1993,270: 2957-2963.
  • 10Rasmussen M, Pitt EA, Ibels LS, et al.Prediction of outcome in acute renal failure by discriminant analysis of clinical variables. Arch Intern Med, 1985, 145:2015-2018.

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部