期刊文献+

英语阅读教学与二语目的语水平制约解析

A Discussion and the Proposal of "Tension Constrained Hypothesis of L2 Reading Proficiency"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在过去的20多年中,英语阅读研究取得了不少重要的进展,这些研究主要在语言学、应用语言学和心理学中进行。这些以"读者为中心"的研究帮助人们进一步理解阅读的本质。从读者的语言知识与能力、认知能力、元认知能力三个层面来评析阅读研究的进展是新的尝试,勾画出一名熟练的优秀阅读者的特点。在此基础上,提出"二语阅读目的语水平制约假说",这一假说认为,母语阅读与二语阅读的一个主要差别在于二语读者的目的语发展与其认知发展和普通知识发展的不同步。这一不同步的矛盾对改进二语阅读教学有重要的启示。 The past 20 years or so have witnessed important advances in reading comprehension research from the fields of linguistics, applied linguistics and psychology. These studies are "reader-centered" in nature and are of great value because they inform researchers and teachers and allow for a better understanding of the nature of reading. This paper attempts to synthesize current theory and research on the reader in three dimensions: language knowledge and processing ability, cognitive ability, and metacognitive strategic competence. A profile of the good reader follows a critical review of the literature. With reference to the EFL reading pedagogy in the Chinese context, we propose a "Tension constrained hypothesis of L2 reading proficiency". This hypothesis argues that a key difference between L1 and L2 readers is the tension between the L2 readers' target maturation. This tension language proficiency and their general knowledge development and conceptual has important implications for EFL reading instruction in China.
出处 《丽水学院学报》 2009年第4期104-109,共6页 Journal of Lishui University
基金 浙江省教科规重点课题(SB31)
关键词 英语阅读研究 熟练读者 二语阅读目的语水平制约假说 教学启迪 English reading research the good reader tension constrained hypothesis of L2 reading proficiency pedagogic implications
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Rayner. K,Pollastek. A. The Psychology of Reading [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989 : 40-89.
  • 2Just.M.A,Carpenter.P.A.The Psychology of Reading and Language Comprehension[M].Boston,Mass:Allyn & Bacon, 1987:289-324.
  • 3Stanovich,K. Towards an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy[J]. Reading Research Quarterly, 1980(16) : 32-71.
  • 4Alderson.J.C.Assessing Reading[ M ].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 : 133-160.
  • 5Grabe.W,Stoller. F. L. Teaching and Researching Reading [ M ]. London:Longman, 2002:18-22.
  • 6Carver. R. P. Reading rate:A review of research and theory [ M ]. San Diego, CA : Academic Press, 1990: 56-58.
  • 7Commander.N.E,Stanwyck,D.J.Illusion of knowing in adult readers:Effeets of reading skill and passage length[J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1997 (22): 168-179.
  • 8Carrell.P.L.Can reading strategies be successfully taught?[J]. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 1998(21 ): 1-20.
  • 9Hopkins,N.M. & Mackay,R.Good and bad readers:a look at the high and low achievers in an ESP Canadian studies reading and writing course[J].The Canadian Modem Language Review, 1997,53 (3) : 473-490.
  • 10Reynolds. R. E,Shepard. C,Lapan. R,Cynthia Kreek,C, Goetz.E.T. Differences in the use of selective attention by more successful and less successful tenth-grade readers [J].Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990,82(4) :749-759.

二级参考文献18

  • 1王文宇.观念、策略与英语词汇记忆[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(1):49-54. 被引量:620
  • 2杜晓新.阅读中认知策略与元认知策略相关及实验研究[J].心理科学,1997,20(2):166-167. 被引量:44
  • 3文秋芳.传统和非传统学习方法与英语成绩的关系[J].现代外语,1996,19(1):37-43. 被引量:188
  • 4吕中舌 涂远程.中国学生英语阅读策略研究[J].清华大学教育研究,1998,(4):74-81.
  • 5Baker, L. & A. L. Brown. 1984. Meta cognitive skills and reading [A]. In D.P. Pearson (ed.). Handbook of Reading Research [C]. New York: Longman.
  • 6Barnett, M. A. 1988. Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension [J]. The Modern Language Journal 72/2:150-162.
  • 7Block, E. L. 1992. See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers [J]. TESOL Quarterly 26/2:319-342.
  • 8Carrell, P. L. 1989. Metacognitive awareness and second language reading [J]. The Modern Language Journal 73/2:121-134.
  • 9Carrell, P. L., L. Gajdusek & T. Wise. 1998. Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading [ J ]. Instructional Science 26: 97-112.
  • 10Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

共引文献225

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部