期刊文献+

美国成年私人专业监护人制度的启示 被引量:3

On the System of Individuals as Private Professional Guardians and Its Inspiration to China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在监护领域内出现的私人监护人是一个相对较新的现象。以往成年监护制度对欠缺行为能力成年人的保护停滞于家庭、亲属或者公共监护,但随着以社会为本位的福利国家构建的开展,现代监护法应逐渐认可私人力量对成年监护的适当介入。但私人专业监护人介入私法领域的同时引起了美国社会的广泛关注,私人专业监护过程中的利益冲突、保险和担保制度、报酬支付以及信誉问题成为美国当今学界探讨的热点,而这些探讨则对我国具有重要的借鉴意义。 The appearance of private professional guardians in the adult guardianship system is a relatively new phenomenon. Previous adult guardianship system gle concept of home or a relative autonomy and public of protecting the incapacitated adults stagnated in the sin- guardianship. Along with the construction of the society - based welfare state, the modern adult guardianship system accepted the suitable involvement of private power. At the same time, the American society attached great importance to the involvement of private power in the area of civil law. The conflict of interest, insurance and bonding systems, fees for guardians and the issue of credibility become the focus of American scholars, and their discussion is an important reference to our country.
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第6期29-35,共7页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金项目"成年监护制度研究"的阶段性研究成果(项目编号:06BFX021) 2008年山东大学跨学科交叉研究项目"精神卫生立法比较研究"的初期成果
关键词 成年监护 私人专业监护人 利益冲突 adult guardianship private professional guardian conflict of interest.
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1孙海涛.美国成年监护人标准制度及其对我国的启示[J].延边大学学报(社会科学版),2009,42(2):131-136. 被引量:3
  • 2California Probate Code, Handbook for conservators [EB/OL]. http: //www. courfinfo. ca. gov, 2003 -8 -8.
  • 3National Guardianship Association, National Guardianship Foundation [EB/OL]. http: //ww. guardinship. org, 2004 - 2 - 24.
  • 4National Guardianship Association, NGA Standard 13 - conflict of interest: Ancillary and support services [ EB/ OL]. http: //www. guardianship. org, 2003-8-6.
  • 5National Guardianship Association. National Guardianship Foundation [ EB/OL ]. http : //www. guardianship. org, 2004 -2 - 13.
  • 6Mary Joy Quinn, Guardianships of adults [ M ]. New York, Spring Pub. Co, 2005. 92.
  • 7Barnes, A, The virtues of corporate and professional guardians Stetson Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 3. 2002. 951-1023. 1
  • 8Mary Joy Quinn, Guardianships of adults [ M ]. New York, Spring Pub. Co, 2005, 94 - 95.
  • 9何自荣.论法律中的利益衡平[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,8(10):26-30. 被引量:6

二级参考文献8

  • 1杨解君.法律关系背后的关系——“法律亚文化关系”初探[J].南京大学法律评论,2001(1):161-171. 被引量:10
  • 2Barnes,A.The virtues of corporate and professional guardians[J].Stetson Law Review,2002,V013 1(3):943-950.
  • 3Mary Joy Quinn.Guardianships of adults[M].New York:Spring Pub.Co.,2005.72,172,173.
  • 4Wingspan.The Second National Guardianship Confer-ence Recommendations[J].Stetson Law Review,2002,Vol 31(3):595-600,600-605,589-602.
  • 5Wood,E.Dispute resolution and dementia:Seeking solution[J].Georgia Law Review,2001,V0135:786-789,790.
  • 6[6]吴庚.行政法之理论与实用[M].台北:台湾三民书局,1995.
  • 7澳德丽·R·查普曼.将知识产权视为人权[J].版权公报,2001,(3):52.
  • 8E·博登海默.法理学--法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.

共引文献7

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部