期刊文献+

3种脱敏剂治疗牙本质过敏症的比较研究 被引量:5

Comparative study of dentine hypersensitivity with three kinds of desensitizer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较有效治疗牙本质过敏症的3种临床药物。方法将100例患者的240颗患牙随机分为3组,分别用Gluma、中药脱敏糊剂和自酸蚀黏接剂I-bond治疗1疗程,即刻和3个月后采用卡方检验比较结果。结果3种脱敏剂的即刻有效率均较高,3个月后观察Gluma组及中药脱敏糊剂组疗效相似,I-bond组疗效下降差异有显著性。结论Gluma和中药脱敏糊剂为相对快速有效的牙本质脱敏剂。 Objective To investigate the effects of three kinds of desensitizer in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Methods A total of 240 teeth from 100 patients with dentine hypersensitivity were divided into three groups, and treated by the three different methods Gluma, Herbal desensitizer and I-bond respectively. The effects of the three different methods were compared with one another. Results The curative rate of I-bond was significantly lower than those of the other two groups. Conclusion Gluma and Herbal desensitizer are rapid and effective dentine desensitizers.
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2009年第6期313-314,共2页 Stomatology
关键词 牙本质过敏症 GLUMA 中药脱敏糊剂 自酸蚀黏接剂 dentine hypersensitivity Gluma Herbal desensitizer I-bond
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献24

共引文献153

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部