期刊文献+

论商事仲裁的保密性 被引量:8

An Analysis on the Confidentiality in Commercial Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 仲裁程序的保密性通常被认为是仲裁的重要优点之一。保密性意味着仲裁程序的参与者负担法律默示的保密义务。但商事仲裁的保密性不是绝对的,在必要情况下应当排除保密义务。 When international arbitration is gaining increasing popularity with transnational businesses, there is a general agreement that among the principal advantages of arbitration as a method of dispute resolution, confidentiality is one of the most attractive selling points. There should be an implied duty of confidentiality. There are some exceptions to the confidentiality rule.
作者 高扬
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第7期37-40,共4页 Hebei Law Science
关键词 商事仲裁 保密性 默示义务 commercial arbitration confidentiality implied duty
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Sophie Napper, The Privy Council on Confidentiality and the Enforcement of Awards in Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited v. European Reinsurance Company of Zurich, 6(2) INTL A.L.R. 43 -44, 2003.
  • 2.新西兰1996年仲裁法第14条.,..
  • 3WIPO仲裁规则第52、73、74、75条.
  • 4Patrick Neill QC, Confidentiality in Arbitration, 12 Arb. Int! 287, 316 - 17, 1996.
  • 5Alexis C. Brown, Presumption Meets Reality: An Exploration of the Confidentiality Obligation in International Commercial Arbitration, 16 Am. U. lntl L. Rev. 969, 2001.
  • 6Anjanette H, Raymond, Confidentiality in A Forom of Last Resort: Is the Use of Confidential Arbitration A Good Idea for Business and Society? 16 Am. Rev. Intl Arb. 479, 2005,
  • 7Gu Weixia, Confidentiality Revisited: Blessing or Curse in International Commercial Arbitration? IS Am. Rev. Intl Arb. 607, 2004.
  • 8[英]艾伦·雷德芬,马丁·亨特.等.林一飞,宋连斌译.国际商事仲裁法律与实践·第四版[M].北京大学出版社,2005.30,31.
  • 9.西班牙2003年仲裁法第32条.,..

同被引文献116

  • 1于晓君.论仲裁的保密性[J].长春工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,22(6):30-32. 被引量:2
  • 2Russell v. Russell, [1880] 14 Ch D 471.
  • 3The Eastern Saga, [1984] 2 Lloyd's Rep 373.
  • 4Cindy G. Buys, The Tensions Between Confidentiality and Transparency in International Arbitration, 14 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 121(2003).
  • 5Eagle v. Fred Motor Co., [2004]809 N.E.2d 1161.
  • 6Ali Shipping v. Trogir, [1999] 1 W.L.R.314.
  • 7Esso Austrilia Resources Ltd and Others v Plowman, [1995]128 A.L.R.391.
  • 8Patrick Neill.Confidentiality in Arbitration. . 1995
  • 9Michael Pryles.Assessing Dispute Resolution Procedures. American Review of International Arbitration . 1996
  • 10Jan Paulsson,Nigel Rawding.The Trouble with Confidentiality. Arbitration International . 1995

引证文献8

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部