对权利与义务本位之争的反思和批判

Reflection and Criticism on Standard Debate Between Right and Obligation

以权利和义务作为法的基本矛盾构建的权利义务法理学,在理论上是一个根本性的错误,其错误就在于用义务取代了社会公共权力,使社会公共权力这一重要的社会现象脱离了法学研究的视野,从而使权利义务法理学存在着重大的理论缺陷。在民主与法治建设已向我们提出了更新更高要求的新形势下,推倒以权利义务为基础的权利义务法理学,以权利和权力为法的基本矛盾重新构建科学的法理学已是当务之急。

The jurisprudence of right and obligation established with right and obligation being the basic conflicts of law is a fundamental fallacy in theory. Its mistake lies in the fact that obligation is substituted for social public right that social public right, as an important sociological phenomenon is separated from the horizons of law studies. As a result, the jurisdiction of right and obligation has severe theoretical defects. In the new situations when the construction of democracy and monocracy is demanding more highly and newly of us, it is urgent to overthrow the jurisdiction of right and obligation and reconstruct scientific jurisdiction with right and power being the basic conflict.