6[1]Theodorou D J,Theodorou S J. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice: Application and in terpretation of scans beyond the numbers. Clinical Imaging, 2002, 26(1): 43～49
7[2]Shaw C C. Gur D. Comparison of three different techniques for dual-energy subtraction imaging in digital radiograph: A signal-to-noise analysis. Journal of Digital Imaging, 1992, 15(4): 262～270
8[3]Kalender W A, Klotz E,Kostari dou L.An algorithm for noise suppression in dual energy CT material density images.IEEE Trans on Medical Imaging,1988,7(3):218～224
9[4]Kido S, Ikezoe J. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm . Radiology,1995,194(2): 407～412
10[5]Genton L, Hans D, Ursula G, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods . Nutrition,2002,18(1): 66～70
2Pathi R, Langlois S. Evaluation of the effectiveness of digital radiography in emergency situations. Australas Radiol, 2002, 46 (2): 167-169.
3Sakaguchi T, Katayama R, Morishita J, et al. Correlation between Basic Imaging Properties and Subjective Evaluations of Two Digital Radiographic X - ray Systems Based on Direct- Conversion Flat Panel Detector. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2010, 66 (11) : 1457 -1466.
4Ghosh P. The Role of SPECT/CT in skeletal malignancies[J]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol,2014,18:175-193.
5Krzhivitskii PI,Kanaev SV,Novikov SN,et al. SPECT-CT in the diagnosis of metastatic skeletal lesion[J]. Vopr Onkol,2014,60: 56-63.
6Hamers S,Freyschmidt J,Neitzel U. Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs. screen-film radiog- raphy:observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics [J]. Eur Radiol,2001,11 : 1753-1759.
