期刊文献+

应用高剂量/庇护所策略管理Bt作物抗性的三个基本假设:综述与展望 被引量:4

Three assumptions of high dose/refuge strategy for resistance management of Bt crops:a review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,抗虫转基因作物的抗性管理方法主要是高剂量/庇护所策略。该策略的有效性取决于3个基本的假设条件:(1)抗虫转基因作物(Bt作物)表达出高剂量的杀虫蛋白,该剂量使得靶标害虫对Bt杀虫蛋白的抗性表现型为功能性完全隐性或近于完全隐性,进而使得Bt作物可以杀死几乎所有的抗性杂合个体和所有的敏感性个体;(2)靶标害虫种群的Bt抗性基因起始频率处于很低的水平;(3)源自转基因作物田和非转基因作物田(庇护所)的成虫在田间随机混合并交配。这3个假设必须同时满足,缺一不可。本文就这3个假设的理论基础和经验研究的进展进行了综合论述,并着重讨论了随机交配假设的最新研究进展以及今后的研究方向和方法。 The high dose/refuge strategy is being applied primarily in field for the resistance management of Bt crops, and its success depends on three essential assumptions. These three assumptions are: (1) Btengineered crops must produce a high dose of Bt insecticidal protein to kill most heterozygotes ; (2) Initial frequency of alleles conferring resistance in target pest species must be rare; (3) Susceptible adults that survived in refuges are expected to intermingling and mating with resistant adults that survived in Bt fields. We reviewed theoretical and empirical results related to these assumptions, and focused on the recent advances in random mating assumption and presented some new theoretical outcomes resulted from modeling researches. We also discussed the direction of upcoming researches and related techniques briefly.
作者 胡阳 傅强
机构地区 中国水稻研究所
出处 《昆虫学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期691-698,共8页 Acta Entomologica Sinica
基金 国家转基因生物新品种培育重大科技专项课题(20082X08012-004) 农业部转基因生物安全管理项目
关键词 转基因作物 抗性管理 高剂量/庇护所策略 抗性基因频率 随机交配 Genetically modified crops resistance management high dose/refuge strategy frequency of alleles conferring resistance random mating
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1Alstad DN,Andow DA,1995.Managing the evolution of insect resistance to transgenic plants.Science,268(5 219):1 894-1 896.
  • 2Andow DA,Alstad DN,1998.F2 screen for rare resistance alleles.J.Econ.Entomol.,9:572-578.
  • 3Andow DA,Alstad DN,Pang YH,Bolin PC,Hutchinson WD,1998.Using an F2 screen to search for resistance alleles to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin in European corn borer (Lepidoptera:Crambidae).J.Econ.Entomol.,91:579-584.
  • 4Andow DA,Ives AR,2002.Monitoring and adaptive resistance management.Ecological Applications,12:1 378-1 390.
  • 5Andow DA,Olson DM,Hellmich RL,Alstad DN,Hutchison WD,2000.Frequency of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ab in an Iowa population of European corn borer (Lepidoptera:Crambidae).J.Econ.Entomol.,93(1):26-30.
  • 6Barry BD,Darrah LL,Huckla DL,Antonio AQ,Smith GS,O'Day MH,2000.Performance of transgenic corn hybrids in Missouri for insect control and yield.J.Econ.Entomol.,93(3):993-999.
  • 7Bates SL,Zhao JZ,Roush RT,Shelton AM,2005.Insect resistance management in GM crops:Past,present and future.Nat.Biotechnol.,23:57-62.
  • 8Bourguet D,Chaufaux J,Se'quin M,Buisson C,Hinton JL,Stodola TJ,Porter P,Cronholm G,Buschman LL,Andow DA,2003.Frequency of alleles conferring resistance to Bt maize in French and US corn belt populations of the European corn borer,Ostrinia nubilalis.Theor.Appl.Genet.,106:1 225-1 233.
  • 9Bourguet D,Prout M,Raymond M,1996.Dominance of insecticide resistance presents a plastic response.Genetics,143:407-416.
  • 10Burkness EC,Hutchison WD,Bolin PC,Bartels DW,Warnock DF,Davis DW,2001.Field efficacy of sweet corn hybrids expressing a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin for management of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera:Crambidae) and Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae).J.Econ.Entomol.,94:197-203.

二级参考文献57

  • 1刘润玺,程桂林,姜延超,吕召芹,刘士文.棉铃虫对农药的交互抗性研究[J].农药,1996,35(5):10-15. 被引量:16
  • 2褚茗莉,许国庆,田本志,赵琦,张一兵,顾兰君,赵季秋,安国香.不同寄主对棉铃虫发育的影响[J].辽宁农业科学,1997(3):35-38. 被引量:6
  • 3Adamczyk J J J R, Sumerford D V. Potential factors impacting season-long expression of CrylAc in 13 commercial varieties of Bollgard cotton [J]. J Insect Science, 2001, 1: 13, 1-6.
  • 4Gore J, Leonard B R, Adamczyk J J. Bollworm ( Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) survival on Bollgard' and Bollgard Ⅱ ' cotton flower bud and flower components [J]. J Econ Entomol, 2001, 94(6) : 1445 -1551.
  • 5Greenplate J T. Quantification of Bacillus thuringiensis insect control protein Cryl Ac over time in Bollgard cotton fruit and terminals [ J ]. J Econ Entomol, 1999, 92(6): 1377-1383.
  • 6Adamczyk J J J R, Adams L C, Hardee D D. Field efficacy and season expression profiles for terminal leaves of single and double Bacillus thuringiensis toxin cotton genotypes [J]. J Econ Entomol, 2001, 94(6) : 1589 - 1593.
  • 7Adamczyk J J J R, Hardee D D, Adams L C, et al. Correlating differences in larval survival and development of bollworm (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) and fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to differential expression of Cryl A (c) δ - endotoxin in various plant parts among commercial cuhivars of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis cotton [ J]. J Econ Entomol, 2001, 94( 1 ) : 284 -290.
  • 8Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G. Transgenie plants: insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt Com [ J ]. Nature 1999, 402 : 480 - 481.
  • 9Meng F X, Shen J L, Zhou W J, et al. Long-term selection for resistance to transgenic cotton expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxin in Helicoverpa armigera (Hiibner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [J]. Pesticide Management Science, 2004, 60(2): 167-172.
  • 10PRAY C E,HUANG J,MA D,et al.Impact of Bt cotton in China[J].World Development,2001,29:813-825.

共引文献31

同被引文献117

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部