期刊文献+

改良弹性评分标准在乳腺良恶性病灶鉴别诊断中的前瞻性研究 被引量:59

Prospective study of improved elasticity scores in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良弹性评分标准在乳腺良恶性病灶鉴别诊断中的价值。方法对手术病理证实的394例患者共508个乳腺病灶进行了超声弹性成像检查前瞻性研究,分别采用改良及旧评分标准评分。结果508个病灶采用改良评分标准均可评分分类,其中82个病灶采用旧评分标准无法评分分类;采用改良及旧评分标准超声弹性成像诊断乳腺良、恶性病灶的准确性分别为88.8%和78.1%。结论改良超声弹性成像评分标准使用更为简便、准确,有助于减少不必要的穿刺活检。 Objective To explore the value of improved elasticity scores in differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions. Methods A prospective study was done in 394 patients with 508 breast lesions confirmed by pathology and the elastographic images of the lesions were evaluated by using old and improved elasticity scores respectively. Results The elastographic images of the lesions could be evaluated and classified in all patients by improved elasticity scores but could not be evaluated and classified in 82 lesions by old elasticity scores. The accuracy of ultrasonic elastography for diagnosing benign and malignant breast lesions was 88.8% and 78. 1%, respectively by old elasticity scores and improved elasticity scores. Conclusions The elastographic images of breast lesions were accurately evaluated by using improved elasticity scores, and the use of improved elasticity scores is helpful to reduce the biopsy which is not necessary.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期514-516,共3页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 广东省医学科研基金项目资助(A2007192)
关键词 超声检查 乳腺疾病 诊断 鉴别 弹性成像 Ultrasonography Breast disease Diagnosis, differential Elastography
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1欧冰,罗葆明,冯霞,杨海云,文艳玲,智慧,马健鸿.超声弹性成像与钼靶X线成像诊断乳腺疾病的对照研究[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2006,3(4):240-241. 被引量:8
  • 2罗葆明,欧冰,冯霞,周敏,文艳玲.乳腺疾病实时组织弹性成像与病理对照的初步探讨[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(9):662-664. 被引量:207
  • 3罗葆明,欧冰,冯霞,文艳玲,智慧.乳腺疾病实时组织弹性成像与彩色多普勒超声的对照研究[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2005,2(5):265-267. 被引量:31
  • 4王怡,王涌,张希敏,秦茜淼,王意达,徐智章.组织弹性成像鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块的价值评估[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(11):1704-1706. 被引量:103
  • 5Lee SW,Choi HY,Baek SY,et al.Role of color and power Doppler imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign solid breast masses.J Clin Ultrasound,2002,30(8):459-464.
  • 6Ozdemir A,Ozdemir H,Maral I,et al.Differential diagnosis of solid breast lesions:contribution of Doppler studies to mammography and gray scale imaging.J Ultrasound Med,2001,20(10):1 091-1 101.
  • 7Mesaki K,Hisa N,Kubota K,et al.Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors using Doppler spectral parameters including acceleration time index.Oncol Rep,2003,10(4):945-950.
  • 8Madjar H,Prompeler HJ,Del Favero C,et al.A new Doppler signal enhancing agent for flow assessment in breast lesions.Eur J Ultrasound,2000,12(2):123-130.
  • 9Itoh A,Ueno E,Tohno E,et al.Comparison between ultrasonic elastogram and histologic findings in breast diseases.Seventh Congress of Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology(AFSUMB 2004),Abstracts,P330.
  • 10Krouskop TA,Wheeler TM,Kallel F,et al.Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.Ultrason Imaging,1998,20(4):260-274.

共引文献592

同被引文献493

引证文献59

二级引证文献511

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部