期刊文献+

大学新生自我同一性状态的性别差异及与人格特征的相关 被引量:13

Gender Differences of Self-identity and Its Correlation with Personality Among Freshmen
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨大学新生自我同一性状态与人格特点的相关及性别差异。方法:使用大学生自我同一性状态量表及卡特尔16项个性因素问卷对203名大学新生进行问卷调查。结果:成就型同一性与稳定性,恃强性,兴奋性,有恒性,敢为性呈显著正相关(r=0.20~0.41),与忧虑性呈显著负相关(r=-0.38);弥散型同一性与人格特征的显著相关方向与前者正好相反(r=0.18~0.38);排斥型同一性与恃强性、敢为性呈显著负相关(r=-0.17^-0.21);延缓型同一性与怀疑性呈显著正相关(r=0.19)。男生的成就型同一性得分显著高于女生(t=2.65,P=0.009),弥散型同一性得分显著低于女生(t=-2.17,P=0.031)。结论:同一性状态、人格的性别差异显著;自我同一性状态的性别差异与人格特征的性别差异具有一致性。 Objective: To explore the relations between self-identity and personality, and the gender differences of these two variables. Methods: 203 college freshmen were asked to finish the questionnaires of self-identity and Cattell's 16 Personality Factor. Results: The achievement status of self-identity had obvious positive correlation with emotional stability, dominance, liveliness, rule-consciousness and social boldness (r=-0.20~0.41), and had obvious negative correlation with apprehension (r=-0.38); The directional correlation between diffusion status and personality was just the opposite (r=- 0.18~0.38). The foreclosure status of self-identity had obvious negative correlation with dominance and social boldness (r=-0.17~-0.21); The moratorium status of self-identity had obvious positive correlation with vigilance (r=-0.19). Male students, compared with female, were higher in achievement status(t=-2.65, P=-0.009), and lower in diffusion status(t=-2.17,P=- 0.031). Conclusion: There are obvious gender differences in self-identity and personality; Gender differences in self-identity statuses and in personality characters are consistent.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2009年第3期263-265,268,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(05JJDXLX164)
关键词 自我同一性 人格 性别 相关研究 大学新生 Self-identity Personality Gender Correlations Freshmen
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Kit W,Erik E. His life , work and singificance. Philade: Open University Press,2000.127-128
  • 2郭金山,车文博.自我同一性与相关概念的辨析[J].心理科学,2004,27(5):1266-1267. 被引量:58
  • 3王树青,朱新筱,张粤萍.青少年自我同一性研究综述[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004,49(3):29-32. 被引量:48
  • 4Clancy SM,Dollinger SJ. Identity, self, and personality: Identity status and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1993.3
  • 5郭金山,车文博.大学生自我同一性状态与人格特征的相关研究[J].心理发展与教育,2004,20(2):51-55. 被引量:67
  • 6Kroger J. Identity in adolescence: The balance between self and other. London: Routledge, 1996
  • 7Erikson EH. Ungdomens identitetskriser [Identity, youth and crisis] (Wiking P,Trans.) Stockholm: Natur och kultur, 1969
  • 8Marcia JE. Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1966,3 (5) :551-558
  • 9Gulfem SC, Gul A. Parental attitudes and ego identity status of Turkish adolescents, Adolescence. Roslyn Heights: Winter, 2005,40 (160) : 847
  • 10Marcia J. Ego identity development. In Adelson J. Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley, 1980

二级参考文献48

  • 1刘萍,王振宏.国外自我概念研究中的理论模型建构述评[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),1997,34(2):84-89. 被引量:44
  • 2张日昇.关于青年期心理特征的中日比较研究[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1991(1):25-34. 被引量:7
  • 3[1]Adams, G., Bennion, L., & Huh, K. 1989) Objective measure of Ego Identity Status: A reference manual. Unpublished manuscript, University of Guelph.
  • 4[2]Akers, J. F., Jones, R. M., & Coyl, D. D. (1998). Adolescent friendship pairs: Similarities in identity status development, behaviors,attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13.
  • 5[3]Archer, S. L., & Waterman, A. S. (1994). Adolescent identity development: contextual perspectives. In C. B. Fisher & R. M. Lerner(Eds.), Applied developmental psychology. New York: McCraw - Hill.
  • 6[4]Balistreri, E., Busch - Rossnagel, N. A., & Geisinger, K. F (1995)Development and preliminary validation of the Ego identity Process Questionnaire. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18.
  • 7[5]Berzonsky, M. D. (1992). Identity Style Inventory, Version 3. Unpublished measure, State University of New York at Cortland.
  • 8[6]Campbell, E., Adams, G. R., &Dobson, W. R. (1984). Familial correlates of identity formation in late adolescence: A study of the predictive utility of connectedness and individuality in family relations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13.
  • 9[7]Clancy, S. M., & Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: Identity status and the five - factor model of personality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3.
  • 10[8]Cramer, P. (1995) Identity, narcissism, and defense mechanisms in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 29.

共引文献249

同被引文献149

引证文献13

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部