期刊文献+

负乘幂本构模型的切线模量 被引量:10

Tangent modulus of negative-power constitutive model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 邓肯-张模型假设土体应力-应变关系符合双曲线关系,而且假定相关参数与围压的关系也是某种固定关系,这样的做法不仅违反了土体性质多样的现实,也容易造成模型与试验结果不符,引起误差。为此,提出了通过常用软件试算获取参数及直接寻求参数与围压最佳关系函数的思想,改变了参数与围压只有一种固定关系的思路。在邓肯-张模型基础上提出了负乘幂本构模型,它能够通过调整一个参数实现曲线形式的变化,从而体现出土体应力-应变关系的多样性;负乘幂模型采用前面提及的思想来获取参数,经过推导得到了该模型的切线模量公式。通过比较,证明负乘幂模型能够更好地与试验曲线吻合。 Duncan-Chang model assumes the stress-strain relation of soils to be hyperbolical and presumes that the relationships between some parameters and ambient pressure are fixed, which not only goes against the fact of varied feature of soils but also can't make the results of model agree with those of test perfectly. Based on analysis of test. with the development of computer, a lot of software is produced, which can fitting curves. So the parameters are able to be got by pilot calculation and the optimum functional relationships between some parameters and ambient pressure also are able to be hunted through these software. This method is different to that of Duncan-Chang model. On the basis of Duncan-Chang model, the negative-power model is established for soils; it's able to display variety of the stress-strain curve of soils using a changeable parameter; and its parameters are determined in the previously mentioned way. The equation of tangent modulus is deduced based on the new method. The negative-power model can better meet test in comparison with Duncan-Chang model.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期2168-2172,共5页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 河海大学科技创新基金项目(No2006407911)
关键词 负乘幂模型 邓肯-张模型 参数 切线模量 negative-power model Duncan-Chang model parameter tangent modulus
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1TERZAGHI K, RALPH B P, GHOLAMERZA M. Soil mechanics in engineering practice[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
  • 2DUNCAN J M, BYRNE P, WONG K S. Stress-strain and bulk modulus of parameters for finite element analysis of stress and movements in soil[R]. San Francisco University of California, Berkeley, 1980.
  • 3LI J, DING D W. Nonlinear elastic behavior of fiberreinforced soil under cyclic loading[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(9): 977--983.
  • 4AL-SHAYEA N, ABDULJAUWAD S, BASHIR R, et al Determination of parameters for a hyperbolic model of soils[J]. Geotechnical Engineering, 2003(2): 105-- 117.
  • 5SANCHAI M, EMMANUEL D. Determination of ground reaction curve for hyperbolic soil model using the hodograph method[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(3): 964--968.
  • 6HABIBAGAHI G, MOKHBERI M. Hyperbolic model for volume change behavior of collapsible soils[J] Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, (2): 264--272.
  • 7何昌荣,杨桂芳.邓肯-张模型参数变化对计算结果的影响[J].岩土工程学报,2002,24(2):170-174. 被引量:91
  • 8王志亮,宋茂天,殷宗泽.路堤沉降计算中邓肯-张模型参数灵敏度分析[J].岩土力学,2004,25(7):1135-1138. 被引量:31
  • 9王志亮,傅琼华,李永池,殷宗泽.路堤沉降计算中邓肯-张模型参数修正初探[J].岩土力学,2004,25(8):1205-1210. 被引量:1
  • 10孔德志,朱俊高.邓肯-张模型几种改进方法的比较[J].岩土力学,2004,25(6):971-974. 被引量:45

二级参考文献19

  • 1王志亮,宋茂天,殷宗泽.路堤沉降计算中邓肯-张模型参数灵敏度分析[J].岩土力学,2004,25(7):1135-1138. 被引量:31
  • 2卢廷浩,邵松桂.天生桥一级水电站面板堆石坝三维非线性有限元分析[J].红水河,1996,15(4):20-23. 被引量:27
  • 3杨桂芳.静力本构模型试验、参数确定及参数对计算结果的影响分析[M].成都:四川大学,1999..
  • 4谢晓华 沈珠江.土石坝计算中非线形模型的改进.水利水运科学研究,1998,(3):43-45.
  • 5沈珠江.土体应力应变分析中的一种新模型[A]..第五届土力学及基础工程学术讨论会论文集[C].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1990.101-105.
  • 6钱家欢 殷宗泽.土工原理和计算[M].中国水利电力出版社,1995.23-50.
  • 7Duncan J M, Chang C Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 1970, 96(SM5): I 629 1 653.
  • 8钱家欢 殷宗泽.土工原理和计算[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1995.20-200.
  • 9张永全 沈蓉 邓军.糯扎渡工程坝料试验及坝料特性研究报告[R].昆明:国家电力公司昆明水利水电勘测设计研究院,2001..
  • 10王昆耀 赵剑明 陈宁.大柳树水电枢纽工程面板堆石坝抗震风险性论证阶段研究报告[R].北京:中国水利水电科学研究院,2001..

共引文献194

同被引文献83

引证文献10

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部