期刊文献+

延安市城郊农村土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响 被引量:6

Effects of Landuse Change on Ecosystem Service Value in Suburban Countryside of Yan'an City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以典型黄土丘陵沟壑区——延安市赵庄村为例,在分析2000—2006年间的土地利用变化的基础上,依据谢高地等人生态服务价值系数对土地利用系统的生态系统服务价值进行了估算,并对其进行了敏感性分析。结果表明,6 a间,研究区土地利用变化主要表现为耕地减少和撂荒地等未利用土地增加。总生态服务价值减少了32.92万元,变化率为1.86%。未利用土地、居住及建设用地、林地、灌草地的生态服务价值增加;耕地、果园、水域的生态服务价值减少。这8种服务功能类型呈减少趋势,只有娱乐文化类型在增加。敏感性指数均小于1,所采用价值系数缺乏弹性,估算价值可靠,系数适合当地情况。根据研究区生态系统服务价值变化特点,应进行针对性的土地利用结构调整。 Taking Zhaozhuang Village of Yan'an City in the typical loess hilly and gully area as a study area, the landuse change from 2000 to 2006 was analyzed. According to coefficients of ecosystem service value (ESV) by Xie Gaodi et al. , the ESV of landuse system was estimated and the coefficient of sensitivity was also analyzed. Results indicated that landuse of the study area changed to some extent during the past 6 years and decreased farmland and increased unused land were the main types. The total ESV decreased by ¥ 329 200 and its change rate was 1. 86%. The ESVs of unused land, residential-constructed land, forest land, and shrubby grassland increased, while the ESVs of farmland, orchard, and water area decreased. Eight types of ecosystem service functions were decreased, while recreation and culture increased. The analysis of the coefficient of sensitivity indicates that the coefficient of ESV adopted is inelasticity, the result is reliable, and the ESV coefficients are suitable. Landuse structure should be pertinently adjusted according to changing characteristics of ESV.
出处 《水土保持通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期50-55,共6页 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家科技计划项目(2006BAD09B10 2006BAD15B10-13) 中国科学院知识创新项目(Kscx2-yw-n-46-04 Kscx-yw-09-07)
关键词 土地利用变化 生态系统服务价值 敏感性指数 延安赵庄村 landnse change ecosystem service value the coefficient of sensitivity Zhaozhuang Village of Yan' an City
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis[M]. Washington.. Island Press, DC,2005.
  • 2Turner B L lI , Skole D, Fischer G, et al. Land-use and land-cover change: science/research plan[R]. IGBP Report No. 7. Stockholm and Geneva, 1995.
  • 3Lambin E F, Bockstael N, et al. Land-Use and Land- Cover Change, Implementation Strategy [R]. IGBP Report No. 48/IHDP Report No. 10.. Stockholm.. IPGP, 1999.
  • 4谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,郑度,李双成.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196. 被引量:2591
  • 5谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉,郑度.青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估[J].山地学报,2003,21(1):50-55. 被引量:313
  • 6陈仲新,张新时.中国生态系统效益的价值[J].科学通报,2000,45(1):17-22. 被引量:960
  • 7Costanza R, d'Arge R,Groot R,et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997,387:253-260.
  • 8延安市统计局.延安市2006年统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2006.
  • 9MankiwN.Gregory.经济学原理[M].梁小民译.北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
  • 10王宗明,张柏,张树清.吉林省生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(1):55-61. 被引量:239

二级参考文献91

共引文献3660

同被引文献79

引证文献6

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部