期刊文献+

上市公司董事会治理效果与财务信息披露质量——一项基于深圳证券交易所的实证研究

Effects of Board Governance in Listed Companies and Quality of Financial Information Disclosure——An Empirical Study of Shenzhen Stock Exchange
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以2003~2007年五年间深交所2857家上市公司为研究样本,采用LOGISTC回归分析方法,从董事会治理的角度,选择董事会规模、独立性、权力结构和行为模式四个特征,探讨它们与信息披露质量之间的关系。实证结果表明:董事会的规模和独立性对公司信息披露质量有积极的作用,董事会的规模越大,独立性越强,就会抑制内部人控制,从而提高信息披露的质量;而两职合一对我国上市公司的信息披露质量造成显著不利影响;实证结果没有发现审计委员会的设立有利于提高公司信息质量,这似乎说明审计委员会制度尚待加大执行力度。 This paper, applying LOGISTC regression analysis on the data of 2857 listed companies in Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2003 to 2007, discusses the relation between quality of information disclosure and four characteristics of board governance, namely size, independence, power structure and behavior pattems. The empirical results show that board size and independence have a positive impact on quality of information disclosure. Large size and strong independence of board can restrain insiders control and improve the quality of information disclosure. Integration of two positions has significant adverse effects on quality of information disclosure in China's listed companies. The empirical results do not show that the establishment of audit committee is of help to improve the quality of information disclosure. It seems that the system of audit committee needs to be implemented more strongly.
作者 赵息 张靖
出处 《西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第3期15-20,共6页 Journal of Xidian University:Social Science Edition
关键词 信息披露质量 董事会治理 独立董事 审计委员会 Quality of Information Disclosure Board Governance Independent Director Audit Committee
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1杨之曙,彭倩.中国上市公司收益透明度实证研究[J].会计研究,2004(11):62-70. 被引量:57
  • 2王平心,吴清华,殷俊明.独立董事制度之弱化治理效应:一种理论假说及其证据[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2006,26(1):37-42. 被引量:9
  • 3Abbott, Lawrence J., Susan Parkerand Gary F.Peters. Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2004, 23( 1 ): 69-87
  • 4Klein, April. Audit committee, board of director characteristics and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2002, 33:375-400
  • 5Beasley, M. S.. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 1996, 71 (10): 443--465
  • 6Beasley, Mark S., Steven E. Salterio. The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2001, 18 (4): 539-570
  • 7Xie, Biao, Wallace N. Devidson, Peter J. DaDalt. Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2003, 9:295-316
  • 8Booth, J. R., D. N. Deli. On executives of financial institutions as outside directors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1999, 5: 227-250
  • 9Chtourou, S., J. Bedard and L. Courteau. Corporate governance and earnings management. Canada: Universite Leval, Working paper, 2001
  • 10Dechow, P., R. Sloan and A. Sweeney. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of finns subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1996, 13:1-26

共引文献286

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部