期刊文献+

分权制衡:从两起典型案例解析美国最高法院司法权的政治性

Separation of powers and checks and balances:on the poiitical attribute of American Supreme Court's judicial power
下载PDF
导出
摘要 无论何种形式的司法权,都是在一定的政治架构下进行的制度配置,从这个意义上说,司法权都具有相应的政治性。美国是典型的分权制国家,司法系统是当今美国社会的重要权力中心之一。本文通过两个典型案件的对比揭示了美国最高法院司法权的政治性,并结合美国的分权体制、联邦法官的选择程序及其他政治因素分析了这种司法政治的成因。在美国那种极为敏感的多元主义政治模式下,美国法院系统决不可能超然于政治系统之外。 Any kind of judicial power is an allocation of institution within a certain political frame. In this sense, the judicial power has its political attribute. The United States of America is a typical country based on separation of powers. Judiciary is one of the important power branches in American Society. This article reveals the po- litical attribute of American Supreme Court' s judicial power through two typical cases. It also analyses the causes of judicial politics connecting with the system of separation of powers, the election process of Federal Court' s judges and other political elements. American judiciary cannot detach itself from the political system within the sensitive political model of pluralism.
作者 张杰
出处 《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第2期106-110,共5页 Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 马伯里诉麦迪逊案 美国诉尼克松案 司法政治 分权与制衡 Marbury v. Madison United States v. Nixon judicial politics separation of powers and checks and balances
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1马克思.对民主主义者莱茵区域委员会的审判(马克思的发言)[M]∥马克思恩格斯全集:第6卷.北京:人民出版社,1961:291-292.
  • 2Kassop N.Separation of powers:polities among the branches[M]// David A Schuhz.Law and Polities.New York:Unanswered Questions.Peter Lang Publishing,Inc,1994,:79.
  • 3Alan B.Morrison.Fendamentals of american law[M].New York:Oxford University Press Ine,1996:52.
  • 4Fisher L.Constitutional dialogue:interpretation as political process[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1988:68.
  • 5Scott v.Stanford,60 U.S.393(1857).

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部