期刊文献+

Diagnostic value of maximal-outer-diameter and maximal-mural-thickness in use of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children 被引量:14

Diagnostic value of maximal-outer-diameter and maximal-mural-thickness in use of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To evaluate the maximal-outer-diameter (MOD) and the maximal-mural-thickness (MMT) of the appendix in children with acute appendicitis and to determine their optimal cut-off values to diagnose acute appendicitis. METHODS: In total, 164 appendixes from 160 children between 1 and 17 years old (84 males, 76 females; mean age, 7.38 years) were examined by high-resolution abdominal ultrasound for acute abdominal pain and the suspicion of acute appendicitis. We measured the MOD and the MMT at the thickest point of the appendix. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their medical records: patients who had surgery (surgical appendix group) and patients who did not have surgery (non-surgical appendix group). Data were analyzed by MedCalc v.9.3. The rank sum test (Mann-Whitney test) was used to evaluate the difference in the MOD and the MMT between the two groups. ROC curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of the MOD and the MMT on diagnosis of acute appendicitis. RESULTS: There were 121 appendixes (73.8%) in the non-surgical appendix group and 43 appendixes (26.2%) in the surgical appendix group. The median MOD differed significantly between the two groups (0.37 cm vs 0.76 cm, P < 0.0001), and the median MMT also differed (0.15 cm vs 0.33 cm, P < 0.0001). The optimal cut-off value of the MOD and the MMT for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children was > 0.57 cm (sensitivity 95.4%, specificity 93.4%) and > 0.22 cm (sensitivity 90.7%, specificity 79.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MOD and the MMT are reliable criteria to diagnose acute appendicitis in children. An MOD > 0.57 cm and an MMT > 0.22 cm are the optimal criteria. MM: To evaluate the maximal-outer-diameter (MOD) and the maximal-mural-thickness (MMT) of the appendix in children with acute appendicitis and to determine their optimal cut-off values to diagnose acute appendicitis. METHODS: In total, 164 appendixes from 160 children between 1 and 17 years old (84 males, 76 females; mean age, 7.38 years) were examined by high-resolution abdominal ultrasound for acute abdominal pain and the suspicion of acute appendicitis. We measured the MOD and the MMT at the thickest point of the appendix. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their medical records: patients who had surgery (surgical appendix group) and patients who did not have surgery (non-surgical appendix group). Data were analyzed by MedCalc v.9.3. The rank sum test (Mann-Whitney test) was used to evaluate the difference in the MOD and the MMT between the two groups. ROC curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of the MOD and the MMT on diagnosis of acute appendicitis. RESULTS: There were 121 appendixes (73.8%) in the non-surgical appendix group and 43 appendixes (26.2%) in the surgical appendix group. The median MOD differed significantly between the two groups (0.37 cm vs 0.76 cm, P〈 0.0001), and the median MMT also differed (0.15 cm vs 0.33 cm, P 〈 0.0001). The optimal cut-off value of the MOD and the MMT for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children was 〉 0.57 cm (sensitivity 95.4%, specificity 93.4%) and 〉 0.22 cm (sensitivity 90.7%, specificity 79.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MOD and the MMT are reliable criteria to diagnose acute appendicitis in children. An MOD 〉 0.57 cm and an MMT 〉 0.22 cm are the optimal criteria.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第23期2900-2903,共4页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by A grant from Korea University
关键词 诊断价值 急性 小儿 超声 厚度 直径 Appendicitis Ultrasonography Pediatrics Diagnosis ROC curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986; 158:355-360.
  • 2Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 1988; 167: 327-329.
  • 3Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Gritzmann N, Daniaux M, Schwamberger K, Ulmer H, zur Nedden D. Ovoid shape of the vermiform appendix: a criterion to exclude acute appendicitis--evaluation with US. Radiology 2003; 226:95-100.
  • 4Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Rettenbacher L, Tomaselli F, Schneider B, Gritzmann N. Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 2001; 218:757-762.
  • 5Hahn HB, Hoepner FU, Kalle T, Macdonald EB, Prantl F, Spitzer IM, Faerber DR. Sonography of acute appendicitis in children: 7 years experience. Pediatr Radiol.1998; 28:147-151.
  • 6Rioux M. Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix. AJR Am J Roentgenol.1992; 158:773-778.
  • 7Simonovsky V. Sonographic detection of normal and abnormal appendix. Clin Radiol.1999; 54:533-539.
  • 8Simonovsky V. Normal appendix: is there any significant difference in the maximal mural thickness at US between pediatric and adult populations? Radiology 2002; 224:333-337.
  • 9Wiersma F, Sramek A, Holscher HC. US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology 2005; 235:1018-1022.
  • 10Park NH, Park CS, Lee EJ, Kim MS, Ryu JA, Bae JM, Song JS. Ultrasonographic findings identifying the faecal-impacted appendix: differential findings with acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol.2007; 80:872-877.

同被引文献99

引证文献14

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部