期刊文献+

多发性骨髓瘤骨髓单个核细胞CCR1和CCR5的表达及临床意义 被引量:1

The expression and clinic significance of CCR1 and CCR5 in patients with multiple myeloma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨趋化因子受体CCR1和CCR5在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者骨髓单个核细胞(BMMNC)中的表达及临床意义。方法:半定量RT-PCR检测28例MM患者BMMNC中的CCR1和CCR5 mRNA水平。结果:46.4%患者同时表达CCR1、CCR5,17.86%患者仅表达CCR1,7.1%患者仅表达CCR5;骨质破坏>2级患者的CCR1、CCR5相对灰度值明显高于骨质破坏≤2级的患者(P<0.05);高度危险组中的CCR1、CCR5相对灰度值明显高于中、低度危险组(P<0.05),而中、低度危险组中的CCR1、CCR5相对灰度值无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:大部分MM患者均表达CCR1和CCR5受体,监测CCR1、CCR5两种受体在MM中BMMNC的表达可以作为评价患者骨质破坏及预后的指标。 Objective:To investigate the expression and clinic significance of ehemokine receptors CCRland CCR5 in bone marrow mononuclear cells(BMMNC) in patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: CCR1, CCR5 was quantified using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction(RT-PCR) in BMMNC in 28 patients. Results:46.4% patients with MM had expressed CCR1 and CCRS, 17.86% patients expressed CCRI and 7. 1% patients expressed CCR5 only. The levels of CCR1 and CCR5 in patients with more than 2 sites bone destruction were much higher than those less than 2 sites bone destruction (P 〈 0. 05 ). The levels of CCR1 and CCR5 in patients with high-risk were much higher than those with intermediate-risk have no significant difference with those patients with low-risk ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion : Most patients with MM expressed CCR1, CCRS, the chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR5 are useful marker in the prediction of patient's bone destruction and out-come of postoperative.
出处 《临床肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2009年第6期520-523,共4页 Chinese Clinical Oncology
基金 广西壮族自治区自然科学基金(Z0848017)
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 骨髓单个核细胞 CCR1 CCR5 骨质破坏 预后 Multiple myeloma(MM) CCR1 CCR5 Bone marrow monouelear ceus(BMMNC) Bone destruction Postoperative
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Terpos E, Politou M, Viniou N, et al. Significance of macrophage inflammatory protein-I alpha( MIP-1alpha) in muhiple myeloma [ J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2005,46 ( 12 ) : 1699 - 1707.
  • 2Hashimoto T,Abe M, Oshima T,et al Ability of myeloma cells to secrete macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 alpha and MIP- 1beta correlates with lytic bone lesions in patients with multiple myeloma[ J]. Br J Haematol, 2004,125 ( 1 ) :38 - 41.
  • 3王晓桃,罗绍凯,莫东华,李娟,莫汉有.巨噬细胞炎症蛋白1α对多发性骨髓瘤细胞增殖与迁移能力的影响[J].中华血液学杂志,2005,26(11):692-693. 被引量:3
  • 4王晓桃,罗绍凯,莫汉有,李娟,莫东华,周润华.巨噬细胞炎症蛋白-1α在多发性骨髓瘤中的表达[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2007,28(2):152-154. 被引量:6
  • 5Michael G,Alexandrakis A, Freda H, et al. Evaluation of bone disease in multiple myeloma: a correlation between biochemical markers of bone metabolism and other linical parameters in untreated multiple myeloma patients [ J ]. Clinic Chim Acta, 2002, 325(1-2) : 51 -57.
  • 6闫骅,吴文,赵维莅,唐伟,徐岚,熊树民,陈钰,沈志祥.多发性骨髓瘤的预后评估和多因素模型的建立[J].肿瘤,2003,23(4):312-314. 被引量:8
  • 7Moller C, Stromberg T, Juremalm M, et al. Expression and function of chemokine receptors in human multiple myeloma[ J]. Leukemia, 2003,17:203 - 210.
  • 8Giuliani N, Lisignoli G, Colla S, et al. CC-Chemokine ligand 20/macrophage inflammatory protein-3alpha and CC-ehemokine receptor 6 are overexpressed in myeloma mieroenvironment related to osteolytic bone lesions[ J]. Cancer Res, 2008,68 (16) :6840 - 6850.
  • 9Abe M, Hiura K, Wilde J, et al. Role for macrophage inflammatory protein(MIP)-1α and MIP-1β in the development of osteolytic lesions in muhiple myeloma [ J ]. Blood, 2002,100 ( 6 ) : 2195 - 2202.
  • 10Oba Y, Lee JW, Ehrlich LA, et al. MIP-lalpha utilizes both CCR1 and CCR5 to induce osteoclast formation and increase adhesion of myeloma cells to marrow stromal cells [ J ]. Exp Hematol, 2005,33 (3) :272 - 278.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Durie BGM, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival[J].Cancer, 1975, 36:842.
  • 2Greipp PR, Raymond NM, Kyle RA, et al. Multiple myeloma:significance of plasmablastic subtype in morphological classification[J]. Blood, 1985, 65:305.
  • 3Kurabayashi H, Kubont K, Tsuchiya J, et al. Prognostic value of rnorphologieal classifications and clinical variables in elderly and young patients with multiple myeloma[J]. Ann Hematol,1999, 78:19.
  • 4Murakaml H, Kawada T, Saitoh T, et al. A staging system for multiple myeloma based on the morphology of myeloma cells[J].Eur J Hematol, 1999, 62:63.
  • 5Finnish Leukemia Group. Long-term survival in multiple myeloma: a Finnish Leukemia Group Study[J]. Br J Hematol, 1999,105 : 942.
  • 6Murakami H, Takada S, Hatsumi N, et al. Multiple myeloma presenting high fever and high serum levels of lactic dehydrogenase, CRP, and interleukin-6[J]. Am J Hematol, 2000, 64:76.
  • 7Blade J, San Miguel JF, Fontanillas M, et al. Increased conventional chemotherapy does not improve survival in multiple myeloma: Long-term results of two PETHEMA trial including 914 patients[J]. Hematol J, 2001, 2:272.
  • 8Durie BGM, Stock-Novack D, Salmon SE, et al. Prognostic value of pretreatment serum β2-microglobulin in myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study[J]. Blood, 1990, 75:373.
  • 9Rodon P, Liassier C, Gauvain JB, et al. Multiple myeloma in elderly patients: presenting features and outcome [J ]. Eur J Haematol, 2001, 66:11.
  • 10Clavio M, Casciaro S, Gatti AM, et al. Multiple myeloma in the elderly: Clinical features and response to treatment in 113 patient[J]. Haematologica, 1996,81:238.

共引文献12

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部