期刊文献+

苯并芘作用下人支气管上皮细胞切除修复交叉互补蛋白Ⅰ表达的变化 被引量:5

Dynamic changes of nucleotide excision repair proteins expression and their correlations with levels of DNA damage in human bronchial epithelia cells exposed to benzo(a)pyrene
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨苯并芘(BaP)作用下的人支气管上皮细胞(16HBE)核苷酸切除修复蛋白(Nucleotide excisionrepair proteins,NER proteins)表达和DNA损伤的时间效应特征,并分析二者之间可能存在的关联性。方法用8μmol/LBaP染毒16HBE细胞0、1、2、4、8、12、24和48 h,以彗星实验检测细胞DNA损伤并以Olive尾矩值(Olive Tail Moments,OTM)评价DNA损伤程度。以Western-blot检测核苷酸切除修复蛋白XPA、XPC、XPF、XPG和ERCC1的表达水平。结果染毒1~2 h时OTM值变化率最大,与正常细胞相比,除染毒1h组外其余各组OTM值均显著性增高(P〈0.01)。各蛋白的表达于染毒8h或12 h升高至峰值而后逐渐下降,其中切除修复交叉互补蛋白1(ERCC1)在峰值时蛋白表达量增高4.2倍,等级相关分析显示OTM与ERCC1表达的变化率呈显著正相关(r=0.892,P〈0.001)。结论ERCC1可能是核苷酸切除修复途径中的限速因子,其具体机制有待于进一步研究。 Objective To investigate the dynamic changes in levels of DNA damage and their correlations with levels of NER proteins in cells exposed to BaP. Methods The human bronchial epithelial cells were exposed to 8μmol/L BaP for 0, 1, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours. The levels of DNA damage were evaluated by the Olive Tail Moments (OTM). The levels of protein expressions were detected by Western-blot. Results The OTM dramatically increased from 1 to 2 h, and then located platform period at durations ranging from 2 to 8 h. The extent of DNA damage gently increased from 8 to 48 h. The levels of these NER proteins significantly increased and peaked at 8^th or 12^th hours in cells exposed to 8 μmol/L RaP. ERCC1 expression increased by 4.2-fold for exposure group at 12^th hours, compared with control group. In addition, there was a significant positive correlation between Olive tail moments and relative ratios of ERCC1 in cells exposed to BaP( r = 0.892, P 〈 0.001). Conclusion Our results suggested ERCC1 may be an important limiting factor for NER, but the mechanism underlying this observation needs further investigation.
出处 《毒理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期177-180,共4页 Journal of Toxicology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30525031) 国家重点基础研究规划项目课题(2002CB512905)
关键词 苯并芘 彗星实验 核苷酸切除修复 BaP Comet assay Nucleotide excision repair
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Phillips DH. Fifty years of benzo(a) pyrene. Nature, 1983, 303 : 468-472.
  • 2Jernstrom B, Graslund A. Covalent binding of benzo( a) pyrene 7,8-dihydrodiol 9, 10-epoxides to DNA: molecular structures, induced mutations and biological consequences. Biophys Chem, 1994, 49:185-199.
  • 3Richards DW. Nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells. J Boil Chem, 1997, 272: 23465-23468.
  • 4Cheng L, Margaret RS, Waun KH, et al. Reduced expression levels of nucleotide excision repair genes in lung cancer: A case control analysis. Carcinogenesis, 2000, 21: 1527-1530.
  • 5杨瑾,刘晓勇,邹云锋牛丕业,宫智勇,袁晶,邬堂春,牛丕业,宫智勇,袁晶,邬堂春,邹云锋.B(a)P作用下的人支气管上皮细胞DNA损伤与XPA、XPC蛋白表达的关系[J].环境与职业医学,2007,24(4):361-364. 被引量:2
  • 6杨瑾,刘晓勇,牛丕业,邹云锋,宫智勇,袁晶,邬堂春.苯并(a)芘作用下的人支气管上皮细胞DNA损伤与XPF、XPG和ERCC1蛋白表达的关系[J].工业卫生与职业病,2007,33(6):328-332. 被引量:2
  • 7Olive PL, Wlodek D, Durand RE, et al. Factors influencing DNA migration from individual cells subject to gel electrophoresis. Exp Cell Res, 1992, 198: 259-267.
  • 8朱志良,庄志雄,黄钰,籍涛.单细胞凝胶电泳图像分析系统的研制及应用[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2001,19(4):298-300. 被引量:89
  • 9Baird WM, Hooven LA, Mahadevan B. Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and mechanism of action. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2005, 45: 106-114.
  • 10Friedberg EC. How nueleotide excision repair protects against cancer. Nat Rev Cancer, 2001, 1: 22-33.

二级参考文献32

  • 1VINEAS P,KOGEVINAS M,SIMONATO L,et al.Levellingoff of the risk of lung and bladder cancer in heavy smokers:an analysis based on multicentric case-control studies and a metabolic interpretation[J].Mutat Res,2000,463:103-110.
  • 2SMITH L E,DENISSENKO M F,BENNETT W P,et al.Targeting of lung cancer mutational hotspots by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[J].J Natl Cancer Inst(Bethesda),2000,92:803-811.
  • 3ZMIROU D,MASCLET P,BOUDET C,et al.Personal exposure to atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a general adult population and lung cancer risk assessment[J].J Occup Environ Med,2000,42:121-126.
  • 4OLIVE P L,WLODEK D,DURAND R E,et al.Factors influencing DNA migration from individual cells subject to gel electrophoresis[J].Exp Cell Res,1992,198:259-267.
  • 5BAIRD W M,HOOVEN L A,Mahadevan B.Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and mechanism of action[J].Environ Mol Mutagen,2005,45:106-114
  • 6PLISKOVA M,VONDRACEK J,VOJTESEK B,et al.Deregulation of cell proliferation by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells reflects both genotoxic and nongenotoxic events[J].Toxicol Sci,2005,83:246-256.
  • 7FRIEDBERG E C.How nucleotide excision repair protects against cancer[J].Nat Rev Cancer,2001,1:22-33.
  • 8DE LAAT W L,JASPERS N G,HOEIJ MAKERS J H.Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair[J].Genes Dev,1999,13:768-765.
  • 9MASUTANI C,SUGASAWA K,YANAGISAWA J,et al.Purification and cloning of a nucleotide excision repair complex involving the xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein and a human homologue of yeast RAD23[J].EMBO J,1994,13:1831-1843.
  • 10VAN DER SPEK P J,VISSER CE,HANAOKA F,et al.Cloning,comparative mapping,and RNA expression of the mouse homologuesof the Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleotide excision repair gene RAD23[J].Genomics,1996,31:20-27.

共引文献90

同被引文献85

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部