摘要
欧盟及其成员国的监察专员制度属于外部议会监督模式,我国一直实行以内部监督为主的行政监察模式。随着《监督法》的实施,我国也将逐步转变为以外部监督为主的监督模式。欧盟监察专员行使的是"软法"的权力,却取得了有效的监督结果。我们可以从议会监督机构的专门化、监督事项的法定化、调查程序的操作性、监督结果的有效性等方面,借鉴欧盟监察专员模式的成功经验和做法,以完善《监督法》。
China＇ s supervisory system belongs to the internal administrative supervisory model, while that of EU and its member states belongs to the external parliamentary supervisory model. Since the implementation of the Law on the Supervision of Standing Committees of People＇ s Congresses at Various Levels, China＇ s supervisory system has been changing to the external parliamentary supervisory model. Using the power of ＂soft law,＂ European Ombudsman has made effective achievements. We can draw on the successful experience and practice of the European supervisory system, including specialization of parliamentary supervision institutions, legalization of supervisory content, practicability of investigation procedures and effectiveness of outcomes, so as to improve China＇ s law on supervision.
出处
《中国行政管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第7期101-105,共5页
Chinese Public Administration
关键词
议会监督
行政监督
欧盟监察专员
《监督法》
parliamentary supervisory system, external supervisory model, internal supervisory model, European Ombudsman
