新中国体育史分期再议——兼答戴敬东、凌平的“商榷”

Further discussion about the division of periods in the sports history of new China——Also a discussion with Mr. DAI Jing-dong and Mr. LING Ping

《中国当代体育史如何分期刍议》中提出的新中国体育史的分期原则不是"双重分期依据",而是单个分期依据。根据这个分期依据,采用社会发展同体育发展相结合,以体育发展为主的方法,将新中国体育史分为4个发展时期,至今新中国体育仍处在第4个发展时期。但由于应对国际金融危机,促进经济平稳较快发展,我国社会主义市场经济体制可能会发生重大变化;以及在科学发展观指导下,进一步推动我国由体育大国向体育强国迈进,有可能将新中国体育推向一个新的发展时期。

In the Discussion about the Division of Periods in the Modern Sports History of China it was put forward that the principle for the division of periods in the modem sports history of new China is not a ＂double criterion for period division＂, but one criterion for period division. According to this period division criterion, the author divided the sports history of new China into 4 development periods by means of combining social development with sports development and focusing mainly on sports development, and concluded that sports in new China is still in the 4^th development period to this day. However, major changes may occur to the socialistic market economic system in China in order to respond to international financial crises and to boost the steadily fast development of economy; sports in new China may go into a new development period as China is further developed from a big sports nation into a powerful sports nation under the guidance of scientific development view.