法律方法下许霆案的应然进程——以许霆案的逻辑争议点展开

The "Ought-to-be" Conclusion of Xu Ting Case under the Legal Method——On Disputes of this Case

分析法律现象,如果没有把握住问题的实质,那么就很难得出正确的结果。适用法律,如果没有实现法律适用与法律的互动,那么植根于我们心中的价值就不能被体现,法律亦将为"死法"。通过归结许霆案的关键性争议,在寻求事件本身实质的基础上,利用法律推理、法律解释等法律方法,对诸种争议及广东省高级人民法院对此案的裁定进行规范性分析,深入探究解决疑难案件时所存在的惯常性思维,对于得出许霆案的规范性结论,具有一定的理论意义和现实意义。

In the legal analysis of a phenomenon, it will be very difficult to get correct conclusions without grasping the essence of the problem. In addition, in the process of applying law, if there is no interaction of law application and law, the value rooted in our heart cannot he reflected in the law and the law has therefore become ＂dead law＂. This paper, focusing on the key disputes of Xu Ting case and the search for the incident itself, uses legal reasoning, legal interpretation and other methods to analyze the disputes and the Guangdong Supreme People＇ s Court＇s verdicts. It is theoretically and realistically significant to study the accustomed thinking modes to draw a regulative conclusion ofXu Ting case.