从转注字的例字谈起——与陈殿玺先生商榷之一

Starting with Examples of Mutually Explanatory Characters——Discuss with Mr.CHEN Dian-xi

陈殿玺先生的《质疑义旁表字义的转注说》对转注字的例字有不少误解,如误解"眼,目也"是引申义,"目"与"眼"不同义;误解"香"和"馨"不是一个概念;误解""字是少数民族的语言,说成是转注;误解"巴巴""爸爸"是联绵字;误解"老"是转注字,又是会意字。现和陈先生商榷。

There are a few misunderstandings of mutually explanatory characters in the book Oppugn the Opinion of Mutually Explanatory Character about Meaning-part Representing Meaning by Mr. Chen dianxi. For example, he mistook 眼 refers to 目＂ for extended meaning and stated ＂目＂ and ＂眼＂have different meanings. He stated wrongly that ＂香＂ and ＂馨＂are not of the same meaning, that ＂[牛甫] is the character of a minority nationality and it is a mutually explanatory character, that ＂巴巴＂ and ＂爸爸＂ are Chinese-words consisting two characters, and that ＂老＂ is both a mutually explanatory character and a ideographic character. As for these mistakes, I want to discuss with Mr. Chen.